DOC PREVIEW
U of U ECE 6130 - Field Analysis of Transmission Lines

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 5 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

ECE 6130: LECTURE 2 FIELD ANALYSIS OF TRANSMISSION LINES Text Section 2.2 Portfolio: 1) How do you calculate the RLGC parameters for a transmission line configuration that isn't in the standard table? See Chapter 2, problem 3. Field Analysis of Transmission Lines Role of E and H in R,L,G,C: Transmission Lines in ECE 3170 used V and I as the waveform variables, R,L,G,C to represent the properties of the line. R,L,G,C were given in tables as a function of the size and shape of the transmission line. These tables are derived from the E and H inside the transmission line. “Unit Length” Section of TL – E and H Field Patterns Given a section of 2-conductor transmission line that is “one unit length long” (like 1 meter): The two conductors have opposite charges, which makes E lines between them, and H lines around them. SEE FIELD PATTERNS FOR TL LINES How do you find these fields? Analytical (Maxwell's equations): In ECE3170, we learned how to find them for coax, parallel plate, single wire, etc. (symmetrical systems) using Maxwell's equations. Analytical (Boundary Value): You can also find the field distributions by applying Laplace's equation ∇2 V =0 and electric field boundary conditions (tangential E is constant across a boundary, normal D is constant across the boundary), and solve this analytically. This is called a "boundary value problem". You can find out more about solving these in… Computational Electromagnetics: We will solve for the fields on a microstrip and/or stripline using the Finite Difference method, which is one way of solving boundary value problems.For all of these methods, we assume: The voltage between the conductors is Vo e±jβz and the current is Io e±jβz . Z is direction of propagation, so this represents + and – traveling waves. Inductance and Capacitance (L and C) from E and H The time-averaged stored magnetic energy is given by (See Section 1.6 and circuit theory): So Inductance per unit length : The time-averaged stored electric energy is given by (See Section 1.6 and circuit theory): So Capacitance per unit length : Power Loss due to losses in the metal conductors (See equation 1.131, surface impedance section): Power Loss PER UNIT LENGTH WILWdsHHWSomm∫==•= 4/||42*μWVCWdsEEWSoee∫==•= 4/||42*εmFdsEEVCSo/*2∫•=εmHdsHHILSo/*2∫•=μ[]WdzdlHHRdsHHRPCsSsc∫∫∫•=•=**22mWdlHHRPCsc/2*∫•=Notes: (1) 2 comes from RMS. H is given as PEAK value, so RMS value = Peak / sqrt(2), and then you are squaring H. (2) * represents CONJUGATE (change sign on imaginary part) (3) C is the total contour of both conductors , C = C1 + C2 (4) Rs is the surface resistance of the conductors = 1/ (σδs) where δs (meters) is the “skin depth” (how far field penetrates before being reduced to 1/e, σ is the conductivity (S/m) From circuit theory: Pc = R |Io|2 / 2 So, series resistance PER UNIT LENGTH : When there is resistance between the conductors (in the substrate or insulating material) PER UNIT LENGTH: unit length is Where ε’’ = imaginary part of permittivity = σ / ω From circuit theory Pd = G|Vo|2 /2, so the shunt conductance per unit length is: Telegrapher’s Equations Lumped element model represents voltage and current on transmission line. Text derives these for field, I will derive them for voltage and current. ∫+Ω•=21/||*2CCsmdlHHIoRRdsEEPSd•=∫2''ωε∫•=SmSdsEEVoG /||''2ωεKirchoff Loop Equation: V(z,t) – R I(z,t) – L di(z,t)/dt – v(z+Δz,t) = 0 R = R’Δz, L = L’ Δz Divide by Δz, combine V terms, and rearrange: V(z,t) / Δz – R’ I(z,t) – L’ dI(z,t) /dt – V(z+Δz,t) / Δz = 0 -[ V(z+Δz,t) - V(z,t) ] / Δz = R’ I(z,t) – L’ dI(z,t)/dt Limit as Δz Æ 0 (difference goes to differential): -dV(z,t)/dz = R’ I(z,t) – L’ dI(z,t)/dt Kirchoff Node Equation: I(z,t) – G v(z+Δz,t) – C dv(z+Δz,t)/dt – I(z+Δz,t) = 0 I(z,t) – G’Δz v(z+Δz,t) – C’Δz dv(z+Δz,t)/dt – I(z+Δz,t) = 0 Divide by Δz and rearrange : -[ I(z+Δz,t) - I(z,t)] / Δz = G’ v(z+Δz,t) + C’ dv(z+Δz,t)/dt Limit as Δz Æ 0 : -dI(z,t) / dt = G’ v(z+Δz,t) + C’ dv(z+Δz,t)/dt Telegraphers equations: -dV(z,t)/dz = R’ I(z,t) + L’ dI(z,t)/dt -dI(z,t) / dt = G’ v(z+Δz,t) + C’ dv(z+Δz,t)/dt Sinusoidal Steady-State Form: Convert to Phasor form (d/dt Æ jω). -dV(z)/dz = (R’ + jωL’) Ι(z) -dI(z)/dz = (G’ + jωC’) V(z) What is difference between this and “regular” circuit equations?? They are a function of z…. distance down the transmission line. Wave Equation form: Take d/dz of one equation, and substitute it into the other equation. (Doesn’t matter which one). See text and copy of Chapter 2 in the IEEE room.-d2 I(z)/dz2 –γ2Ι(z) = 0 Alternate form : -d2 V(z)/dz2 –γ2V(z) =


View Full Document

U of U ECE 6130 - Field Analysis of Transmission Lines

Download Field Analysis of Transmission Lines
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Field Analysis of Transmission Lines and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Field Analysis of Transmission Lines 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?