DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley MCELLBI 230 - Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-b signaling

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 7 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

REVIEWSTIBS 25 –FEBRUARY 2000640968 – 0004/00/$ – See front matter © 2000, Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0968-0004(99)01519-4TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-b(TGF-b) family members, which includeTGF-bs, activins and bone morpho-genetic proteins (BMPs), are secretedsignaling molecules that regulate aplethora of cellular responses, such asproliferation, differentiation, migrationand apoptosis. TGF-b family membershave critical roles during embryogenesisand in maintaining tissue homeostasisduring adult life. Deregulated TGF-b fam-ily signaling has been implicated in mul-tiple developmental disorders and in var-ious human diseases, including cancer,fibrosis and auto-immune diseases1.TGF-b family members transducetheir signals across the plasma mem-brane by inducing the formation of het-eromeric complexes of specific type Iand type II serine/threonine kinase re-ceptors (Fig. 1). The type I receptor isphosphorylated and activated by thetype II receptor and has been shown todetermine signaling specificity withinthe receptor complex. Activated type Ireceptors initiate intracellular signalingthrough activation of specific Smad pro-teins that relay signals into the nucleuswhere they, together with other pro-teins, direct transcriptional responses1.Thus, reminiscent of many other tran-scription factors, Smad activity is regu-lated by translocation from the cyto-plasm to the nucleus. In this review, wewill focus on the function of vertebrateSmads as nuclear effectors of TGF-b sig-naling and on how other signaling inputsaffect the TGF-b/Smad pathway.Smad family: R-Smads, Co-Smads and I-SmadsThe TGF-b/Smad pathway has beenconserved throughout evolution. Smad-related genes were first discoveredthrough genetic screens in Drosophilaand Caenorhabditis elegans. The nameSmad is a fusion of two gene names,Drosophila mothers against dpp (Mad )and C. elegans Sma, the gene products ofwhich were found to perform criticalroles downstream of a BMP homolog,Dpp, and Daf-4 serine/threonine kinasereceptor, respectively1. Nine distinct ver-tebrate Smad family members have nowbeen identified, and Smads can be classi-fied into three groups1. Receptor-regu-lated Smads (R-Smads) are phosphory-lated differentially by activated type Ireceptor kinases on two serine residuesin a SS[V/M]S motif at their extreme C termini (Figs 1,2) upon which they formheteromeric complexes with common-partner Smads (Co-Smads)1. One mam-malian Smad4 is known, and two distinctCo-Smads (Smad4a and Smad4b) havebeen identified in Xenopus2,3. Searchesfor other mammalian Co-Smads are ac-tively being pursued in several laborato-ries. The inhibitory Smads (I-Smads;Smad6 and Smad7) act in opposition tosignal-transducing R- and Co-Smads,forming stable associations with acti-vated type I receptors and thus prevent-ing the phosphorylation of R-Smads(Fig. 3). Smad6 has also been shown tocompete with Smad4 for heteromericcomplex formation for activated Smad1(Ref. 1).R-Smads and Co-Smads share two do-mains of high sequence similarity attheir N and C termini (Fig. 2)1. TheseMad-homology domains (MH1 and MH2)are separated by a proline-rich linker re-gion of variable length and have distinctfunctions (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The MH2domain is important for homo- and het-eromeric complex formation and fortranscriptional activation and repres-sion1. The L3 loops in the MH2 domainsmediate interaction with type I recep-tors4, and the H1 a helix in the MH2 do-main is important for the interaction ofALK-1 with Smad15. The MH1 domains ofSmad3 and Smad4 have intrinsic DNA-binding activities and also associatewith other transcription factors.Furthermore, MH1 and MH2 domains in-teract with and repress the activity ofeach other (Table 1 and see below)1. I-Smads have conserved MH2 domainsthat are sufficient for type I receptor in-teraction and inhibitory activity. The N-terminal regions of I-Smads might directsignaling specificity to I-Smads.Activation of R- and Co-SmadsThe first intracellular step in theTGF-b/Smad pathway, the recruitmentof Smad2 and Smad3 to the TGF-b recep-tor complex, is controlled by a mem-brane-associated FYVE-domain-contain-ing protein, termed Smad anchor foractivation (SARA)6. SARA presentsSmad2 and Smad3 to the activated type Ireceptor by binding cooperatively toboth non-phosphorylated Smads andthe TGF-b receptor complex. SARA doesnot interact with Smad1, Smad4 or I-Smads. Ectopic expression of SARAmutants that lack the phospholipid-binding FYVE domain interfere quitestrongly with TGF-b signaling6.R-Smads interact directly with acti-vated type I receptors1; the L45 loopSignaling inputs converge onnuclear effectors in TGF-bsignalingPeter ten Dijke, Kohei Miyazono and Carl-Henrik HeldinRecent studies have consolidated the pivotal role of Smads as intracellulareffectors of TGF-b family members. Upon binding to their specific type Iand type II serine/threonine kinase receptors, each family member acti-vates a particular subset of Smad proteins. Activated, receptor-regulatedSmads form hetero-oligomeric complexes with common-partner Smadsthat translocate into the nucleus, where they control the expression of tar-get genes in a cell-type-specific manner. Smads appear to function not onlyas nuclear effectors for TGF-b family members, but as signal integratorswithin an extensive intracellular network.P. ten Dijke and C-H. Heldin are at theLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Box595, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden; andK. Miyazono is at the Dept of Biochemistry,The Cancer Institute of Japanese Foundationfor Cancer Research (JFCR), 1-37-1 Kami-ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170-8455, Japan.P. ten Dijke is currently at the Division ofCellular Biochemistry, The NetherlandsCancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CXAmsterdam, The Netherlands.Email: [email protected] 25 –FEBRUARY 200065that protrudes from the ki-nase domain and controlstype I receptor signalingspecificity was found to be acritical determinant in speci-fying Smad isoform interac-tion7. Upon phosphorylationof Smad2 and Smad3 by acti-vated type I receptors, R-Smads and SARA dissociatefrom the TGF-b receptor com-plex. Phosphorylation of R-Smads relieves the auto-inhibitory MH1–MH2 interac-tion and allow R-Smads toform complexes with Smad4through their MH2 domains,an interaction that is mutuallyexclusive with binding toSARA6. The released SARA iscapable of recruiting othernonactivated Smad2 or Smad3for receptor presentation.SARA expression and sub-cellular location thus


View Full Document

Berkeley MCELLBI 230 - Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-b signaling

Documents in this Course
lecture 5

lecture 5

58 pages

Load more
Download Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-b signaling
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-b signaling and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Signaling inputs converge on nuclear effectors in TGF-b signaling 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?