DOC PREVIEW
MIT 15 010 - Limiting Market Power

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 13 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Overview: Limiting Market Power • Introduction to Anti-trust • Price Fixing • Monopolization – Predatory Pricing – Tying and Extension of Monopoly • Other Practices • Common Property Resources 1“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible to prevent such meetings by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice.” Why Do We Care? • Big money is involved . . . & even jail – Roche vitamin division global fines = $1 billion! – ADM executives sentenced to prison • Managing anti-trust exposure is very important – Can change the way a company conducts its business. – Often a part of competitive strategy. – Key consideration for mergers and acquisitions. • About 90% of anti-trust cases in the U.S. are between companies 2Outline of U.S. Anti-Trust Laws Contract/Conspiracy Practices that Threaten Other “Unfair” Practices Restraint of Trade Competition Price Fixing • M & A Æ concentration Deceptive Advertising • Price Discrimination Labeling • Explicit Dirty Tricks • Implicit Monopolize (or attempt) Vertical Restraints • Retail Price Maintenance • Tying Contracts • Exclusive Dealing • Territorial Restrictions • Exclusive Selling (Franchise) (Sherman Act) (Clayton and Robinson-Patman Acts) (Federal Trade Commission) Also: Individual States have specific antitrust laws 3Per se vs. Rule of Reason • Price fixing is per se illegal • Many other actions are judged according to a “rule of reason” – Is the practice likely to results in substantially less competition? – If so, is there a compelling business justification for the practice that outweighs the anti-competitive consequences? What You Absolutely Can’t Do (in the U.S.) • Price fixing • Functional equivalents of price fixing, e.g., – Customer or market allocation – Minimum retail price maintenance 4Recent Examples of Price Fixing • NASDAQ 1/4 point phenomenon • US Airline reservation systems • Ivy League Schools • ADM and lysine • (alleged) Marsh & McLennan and commercial insurance 5Monopolization (or Attempt) • Predation and predatory pricing – Incumbent firm lowers prices below costs to push rival firms out, or prevent entry. – E.g., • Airlines • Microsoft set Price of Internet Explorer to zero (alleged to be predatory) • Constructing or maintaining barriers to entry – E.g. Microsoft in o/s market (details later today) Monopolization (cont.) •Tying – When a seller conditions the sale of one product on purchaser’s agreement to buy a second (different) product •Examples – Kodak – Internet Explorer and Windows 6Ooops…. In late 1996 senior Microsoft exec James Allchin wrote – “I don’t understand how IE is going to win. The current path is simply to copy everything that Netscape does packaging and product wise.….My conclusion is that we must leverage Windows more. Treating IE as just an add-on to Windows which is cross-platform [means] losing our biggest advantage --Windows market share.” Ooops Again . . . “Memphis [MS codename for Win98] must be a simple upgrade, but most importantly it must be killer on OEM shipments so that Netscape never gets a chance on these systems.” (James Allchin, senior MS exec 1996) 7Microsoft is a Monopolization Case • To prove monopolization, authorities have to show: – Possession of monopoly power in relevant market – Willful acquisition or maintenance of market power • Being a monopolist is not illegal • often hard to determine willful if firm has good anti-trust compliance procedures in place • If shown => treble damages to injured. – Ouch! Price Discrimination • “Between commodities of like grade and quality”, not allowed in intermediate goods markets if the effect is to lessen competition •Examples – Retailers who suffer from manufacturers providing price discounts to big stores like Wal-Mart • If you’re a small store, you can sue both manufacturer and big store -- and get treble damages – Retail druggists vs. drug pharmaceutical companies 8Examples of Vertical Restraints • Exclusive dealing – Toys R Us – Ben and Jerry’s • Resale Price Maintenance – Newspaper distributors (maximum) Unfair or Deceptive Practices • Deceptive Advertising • Bait and Switch • Vioxx • Labeling • Homeopathic medicines • Dirty tricks • Microsoft + Dr. Dos • BA and Virgin Atlantic 9Common Property Resources • Justification for Coordination • Definition: – Resource can be used without payment. – Many have free access – Use by one affects others (externality) •Examples: – Cows on common land (the “commons”) – Cars on the freeway – Fish in the ocean – Planes in the sky Common Property Resources: Oil Example • N = total wells drilled • q = output per well • Q = total production = Nq • P = oil price = $15 per barrel • Drilling cost = $1500 per well • With more wells the pressure drops, so that q = 1000 - N 10Oil Field: Many Developers Π• To firm i, the profit from one more well is i = Pq - 1500 • Developers will add more wells up to the break-even point, as they see it: Pq − 1500 = 15(1000− N ) − 1500 = 0 • And at this point, – N = 900 wells – Q = 90,000 barrels – q = 100 barrels, and Πi = $0 !?! Many Developers 15,000 Value per well (MR to $ per individual driller) well MC1500 900 Number of wells 11Joint Venture (covering all land) • Community’s profit drilling wells is Πc = PQ - 1500N = 15(1000N - N2) - 1500N • A manager will add wells up to the point where dΠc /dN = 15(1000 - 2N) - 1500 = 0 • And at this point – N = 450 wells – Q = 247,500 barrels – q = 550 barrels and Πi = $3.04 million Joint Venture Management MC well 1500 450 15,000 Value per well Number of wells MR to the $ per community 12The “Commons”: Summary • Individual or firm sees the marginal (private) effect of actions, not the overall effect on the community as whole • Private cost/benefit ≠ Community cost/benefit • How do you see this problem being dealt with – In oil fields? – In fishing? – Highways? – Air traffic? Take Away Points • Price fixing is illegal. Monopoly is not illegal, willful monopolization is. •


View Full Document
Download Limiting Market Power
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Limiting Market Power and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Limiting Market Power 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?