DOC PREVIEW
MIT 16 01 - Study Notes

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Muddy Card Responses Lecture M20 3/10/2004 Synopsis: Covered mechanisms and mechanics of fatigue. Fatigue in metals due to initiationand growth of cracks under cyclic loading. The fundamental mechanisms is local plasticityallowing cracks to initiate from persistent slip bands at local stress concentrations (surfaceroughness, contact points, wear damage). Cracks grow due to plasticity at the crack tip.Empirical models exist for lifetime vs. applied stress amplitude (S-N curves) and for the crackgrowth rate as a function of stress intensity factor range. These models can be used in designand operation either for damage tolerant design or for safe life design. You mentioned the different levels of visual inspection of aircraft. How often would a typical aircraft get a full tear-down? It seems like the cost for such a massive inspectionwould be prohibitive, particularly for an airline with thousands of aircraft in activeservice. I think that this occurs every 3-5 years. The cost is a big issue, however the cost ofa structural failure on consumer confidence in the airline is much higher. When atoms are split where do the electrons from the bonds go (picture attached – similarto A&J figure 14.3). Very good question. If a material undergoes a cleavage fracture in avacuum then the bonds are left “dangling, i.e. the valence electrons of the atoms do notparticipate in bonding, which means that the atom is not in it is minimum energy state. This means that if the other crack surface is brought back in contact with it the bonds can reformand the crack can heal to some extent. This also requires the surfaces to be very smooth. If fracture occurs in air then the “dangling” bonds will tend to react with species in the air - the surface will oxidize or other stray crud (often hydrocarbons) will adsorb onto the surface. Firstly I assume that the factors of 4, 2 etc. are obtained through testing. How are we sure they apply to all materiasl etc. You are correct, this sort of data is derived from extensive testing, and you cannot take data from one material and expect it to apply to others. The scatter in the data (which is where the factors of 4 and 2 on life estimates comes from) willalso be material dependent. Can you explain the difference between low cycle fatigue and high cycle fatigue, I missedthat part? Generally low cycle fatigue implies that some significant fraction of the structureunder test exceeds the yield stress in each cycle. In high cycle fatigue the structure behaveselastically at the macroscopic level (although there will be small scale plasticity. Some times high cycle fatigue is used to simply imply lifetimes greater than 10,000 cycles. Is this correct (1) harder materials don’t fatigue easily because the plasticity is low. (2) lowcycle fatigue is due to low plasticity. The first answer is correct, the second is not. See explanation above. Do Gc and Kc take into account non-metals or fibrous materials where the direction of the cracks seems to matter.? This is an important question. Gc and Kc work quite well for allhomogeneous materials: metals, ceramics, glasses and polymers. They work less well forheterogenous materials such as composites or other laminated materials. As you say in thesematerials cracks can deflect at interfaces and failure is often not by the propagation of a singledominant crack. The concepts of toughness or fracture toughness should be used carefully inthese situations. HYPOTHETICALLY… You have an absolutely perfectly symmetrical beam – Nothingleading it to buckle one way or the other… At ALL. So what really happens? Will it reallybuckle? Hmmm. Simple answer, it is hypothetical it won’t really do anything(hypothetical=imaginary). Hypothetically it would not buckle – it could continue to deformaxially. In reality one cannot achieve this perfect symmetry so in reality it will always buckle! With cyclic loading does the material inside the crack experience work hardening also?Woun’t help structure I wouldn’t think, I’m just curious. This is an excellent question. Yes. The material at the crack tip does work harden. A key result of this is that if an overload (asingle high load cycle) is applied then the material ahead of the crack tip yields and becomesharder. This actually slows the crack down (there is less plasticity in each subsequent cycle)until the crack has grown through the work hardened zone. This is a level of detail beyondwhat you need to know for Unified. It might be worth mentioning that the definition of safety in aerospace is not the standardOED definition. Despite the fact that the safety factor is only 1.5 ish, the procedures anddesigns in place are robust enough to live up to the standard OED definition. How manycatastrophic events are there each year? Not many at all. Most are human factors anyway.Technical problems are constantly being updated and worked on through AD ‘s andservice bulletins. This is an important point. The design and operating process foraerospace structures is really pretty conservative given the high stress levels and lightweight. The use of frequent inspections and the proactive efforts of the operators,manufacturers and regulators is a key to this. Fatigue failures are really very rare and areusually due to a human factors error themselves, i.e. someone skips a scheduled inspection oris incorrectly trained to conduct the inspection. Thanks, now I’m scared to fly commercial. I should try to allay your fears. Commercial aircraft are really very safe indeed. The inspection process really works very well and is avery conservative approach to dealing with fatigue. Materials was a fun subject even though it got really hard at the end. Thanks Prof. Spearing! Thankyou. Please do ask me about the bits you found hard – remember I am hereto help. Will you teach any other classes next semester. Unfortunately not! No mud. I am sad that Materials is over; I’ve really enjoyed your lectures. I will miss youtoo! No mud. Are there any course 16 materials classes (not structures like 16.20) but actuallycourse 3 stuff. 16.21 has a module on fracture, fatigue, creep and yield, so this is the closestwe get.There were 3 other muddy cards with no mud.


View Full Document

MIT 16 01 - Study Notes

Documents in this Course
Fluids

Fluids

3 pages

Fluids

Fluids

4 pages

Fluids

Fluids

4 pages

Fluids

Fluids

5 pages

Load more
Download Study Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Study Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Study Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?