DOC PREVIEW
EVERGREEN MIT 2008 - Science vs. Sacred Rights

This preview shows page 1-2-23-24 out of 24 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Kennewick Man: Science vs. Sacred Rights (Why Should we Care?)Who is Kennewick Man?Slide 3Kennewick Man isn’t Asian nor Native American…Slide 5How do we know ethnicities?How do we know dates?Artifacts can also point to cultural relationships:Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16The Confederated Tribes of the UmatillaArgument for ReburialSlide 19The LawThe Law (Continued)Slide 22Summary of Native American perspective on Sacred RightsSlide 24Kennewick Man: Science vs. Sacred Rights(Why Should we Care?)•A recent flood washed your grandmother's casket into a riverbed. Since her remains have been disturbed anyway, local scientists want to study them. Should they be allowed to? Why or why not?•What about your great-grandmother? What about your great-great-grandmother? What about your great-great-great-grandmother? (etc.)•What if studying her remains could benefit mankind?Who is Kennewick Man?•Kennewick Man’s remains were found by some college students in 1996•Since the remains were found in a watershed, they fell under the control of the Army Corps of Engineers.•A preliminary examination suggested caucasoid features initially labeling the remains as those belonging to a white settler•The clovis point in his hip and subsequent dating put the remains at approximately 9,000 years old•Because the remains were found in ancestral tribal land, the Umatilla claimed the remains under NAGPRA•Scientists filed a law suit, requesting that the remains not be given to the Umatilla tribe, so science could study them.Caucasian Skull Asian SkullKennewick Man Skull•How is Kennewick Man’s skull similar to the Caucasian skull?•How does Kennewick Man’s skull differ from the Asian skull?Kennewick Man isn’t Asian nor Native American…Native American SkullAsian Male SkullKennewick Man SkullThen, how did he get here???This is the current model of human migrationThe letters correspond to where people from each group came from and went to. The colors represent thousands of years before present. The dotted lines represent presumed migrations, as the routes are now underwater.How do we know ethnicities?Mitochondrial DNA: DNA from part of a cell that is used to study differences over extended periods of timeHow do we know dates?•Carbon dating:–Carbon 14 is present in all organic material and is absorbed (eaten) by all living creatures–Carbon 14 decays into Nitrogen 14–The ratio of Carbon 14 to Nitrogen 14 determines how long ago something stopped ingesting carbon, how long ago something diedArtifacts can also point to cultural relationships:These are Clovis Points (named for Clovis, NM). They represent a specific stone age technology and specific indigenous cultures during a specific time, 13,000-9,000 years ago. A clovis point was found in Kennewick Man’s hipSCIENCE and THE FIRST AMERICANSArcheologists’ Point of View-Studying the Past is Essential:We all share the past -- no one owns it. Science should be conducted to uncover the truth for all people for all time. www.friendsofpast.orgArcheology is especially important and useful in helping us to understand people and events about which little or nothing has been writtenThe past will be lost unless we defend our right to learn about the heritage of all Americans. This evidence must be preserved, and scientists must be allowed to study it, if we hope to identify and understand the lives of the earliest Americans.Science offers the process to test hypotheses using factual evidence. We must keep our country free for exploring and expressing all views and explanations of our past.We must insist that good scientific methods be practiced, free of political motives. WHY Should We Care?In previous centuries archeologists were content simply to find objects. Today, armed with computers, laboratory analysis, theories about society and culture, and a wide range of questions about human development and migration, scientists now have the tools to shed light on the origins of the First Americans.In other words - We have the tools and the technology, why not use them? CREATING NEW TECHNOLOGIES: "The business of trying to find out who is related to who is something that we should be aware of.” C. Loring Brace, is a professor of anthropology at the University of Michigan who believes Kennewick Man may have been a descendant of the ancient Jomon people of Asia. "He [The Kennewick Man] is going to continue to reshape our thoughts about how the world was populated." Doug Owsley is forensic anthropologist for the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. WHAT THE SCIENTISTS SAY ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE KENNEWICK MAN“Only through scientific study of important discoveries such as Kennewick Man can objective knowledge of America's rich and diverse past be developed and fully appreciated by all communities who have a stake in the past.”Dr. Bonnichsen professor of anthropology at OSUSacred rights: The Confederated Tribes of the UmatillaThe Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla •Made up of The Umatilla, Yakima, Nez Perce, Colville, and Wanapum.•All five tribes have potential ties to Kennewick Man— these tribes share similar religion, traditions, and oral histories going back over 10,000 years; as such, any remains are ancestral. They call this ancestor the Ancient One.•Their people have been part of this land since the beginning of time.•Do not believe that their people migrated to this continent (as scientists do).Argument for Reburial•Confederated tribes agree that the Ancient One should be reburied as soon as possible.•Once a body goes into the ground it is meant to stay there until the end of time.•Leaving the Ancient One unburied is desecrating this ancestor.“Scientists have dug up and studied Native Americans for decades. We view this practice as desecration of the body and a violation of our most deeply-held religious beliefs.”-Armand MinthornThe Law•The Ancient One is protected under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA, 1990).•NAGPRA protects Native American burials and cultural resources from destruction. •NAGPRA requires return of human remains and artifacts that scientists have been desecrating for years.The Law (Continued)•Under NAGPRA Native American tribes have the right to file a claim to have remains reburied.•Confederated Tribes filed a claim based on belief that the


View Full Document

EVERGREEN MIT 2008 - Science vs. Sacred Rights

Documents in this Course
LES

LES

2 pages

Load more
Download Science vs. Sacred Rights
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Science vs. Sacred Rights and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Science vs. Sacred Rights 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?