NICHOLLS BIOL 404 - Factors Limiting Distribution - Chapter 6

Unformatted text preview:

Factors Limiting Distribution: Interrelations With Other Species – Chapter 6Types of InteractionsPredationPredation – restriction of prey by predatorPredation Examples – Mussel TransplantPredation on KelpKelp – Predator Controlled PopulationRock Wallaby – Predator Controlled PopulationRat-kangaroo – Predator Controlled PopulationRestriction Of Predators By PreyMonphagous InsectsDisease and ParasitismPowerPoint PresentationAllelopathySmother CropsCompetitionSlide 17Checkerboard DistributionsCompetition Between Two SalamandersSlide 20Example - Shift in DietFactors Limiting Distribution: Interrelations With Other Species – Chapter 6Types of Interactions•Negative Interactions–Predation, competition, disease, parasitism•Positive Interactions–Mutualism, symbiosisPredation•‘Prey’ can be a food plant and the ‘predator’ a herbivore.•Or ‘prey’ can be a herbivore and the ‘predator’ a carnivore.Predation – restriction of prey by predator•Predators are sometime able to restrict local distributions of some prey•Experiments have shown this to be true when:–Prey individuals will survive when transplanted to a site where they do not normally occur if they are protected from predators.–The distribution of prey organisms and suspected predator(s) are inversely correlated.–The suspected predator is able to kill the prey, both in the field and laboratory.–The suspected predator can be shown to be responsible for the destruction of the prey in transplantation experiments.Predation Examples – Mussel TransplantTidal Open Coast – heavy wave action restricts the size of mussels and prevents predators from eliminating small musselsSheltered Waters – Predators eliminate most of the small mussels, and Mytilus survive only in areas safe from predatorsPredation on Kelp•Kelp is a large plant-like brown algae.•Several herbivores are known to eat kelp.•There is an inverse correlation between the presence of kelp and sea urchins.•Need to control for other herbivoresKelp – Predator Controlled Population TimeControl SitesOnly Limpets RemovedOnly Seas Urchins RemovedBoth Sea Urchins and Limpets RemovedAugust 19821 2 6 5February 19832 3 25 60August 19831 1.5 60 93February 19840.5 1 85 95% leafy cover; From Fletcher 1987It appears that sea urchins are mostly responsible for controlling kelp:Rock Wallaby – Predator Controlled PopulationIn Australia, Rock Wallaby populations have been declining since the introduction of the red fox.When red foxes are removed, rock wallaby populations expand.Extinct Population!Rat-kangaroo – Predator Controlled PopulationOnly exists in areas where the red fox is absent.This case, as well as the others, demonstrate that predation can control local distributions of populations.Restriction Of Predators By Prey•If a prey restricts a predators range, then that predator must feed only on one or two species of that prey.–Mostly plant/herbivore interactions•These type of predators are called specialists or monophagous.•One example is Drosphila pachea, a rare fruit fly that only breeds in the stems of senita cactus.–They contain a unique factor needed for growth and development by the flyMonphagous InsectsMonophagous insects should be limited in their distribution by their host plant – but no species to date has demonstrated this (Quinn et al. 1998):Disease and Parasitism•Pathogens may eliminate species from areas and thereby restrict geographical distribution.–Chestnut blightHawaiian Bird Populations- disease controlIntroduced birds are less susceptible to malaria than native birds.Mosquitoes much more common in low elevations.Malaria is most common at intermediate elevations – native birds more susceptible and species overlap.Allelopathy•Some organisms, plants in particular, may be limited in local distributions by poisons or antibiotics, also called allelopathic agents.–Penicillin, toxic secretions from plantsStudies have shown that some plant species produce a toxin that limits the growth of others.Smother CropsAverage Dry Weight per Plant (g) After 2 Months of GrowthBarley Chickweed # of Chickweed Flowers4.15 3.20 100+Controls (each grown alone, competition absent)4.85 1.43 101:1 barley/chickweed mixture (competition present)Smother crops act as weed suppressors. It is not competition for nutrition or water, but rather a toxic secretion that limits growth.Competition•Competition can occur between any two species that use the same type of resource.•Competition is an important process affecting the distribution of plants and animals.•Species do not need to be closely related–Birds, rodents, and ants all compete for seeds in the desert.Competition•Resource competition – when a number of organisms utilize common resources that are in short supply.•Interference competition – when the organisms seeking a resource harm one another in the process, even if the resource is not in short supply.•When species A is absent, species B lives in a wider range of habitats.•In extreme cases a habitat will contain either A or B, but neither both together.Checkerboard DistributionsTwo closely related species of fruit pigeons.Islands may have been colonized by first-come-first-served basis or slight competitive advantage.Two ecologically similar species that have mutually exclusive but interdigitating distributions.Competition Between Two Salamanders•Plethodon jordani and P. glutinosus (Hairston 1980).•Altitudinal distribution only overlaps 70 – 120m on any one transect up the Black Mountains in North Carolina.•Hairston demonstrated that by removing one species, the other expanded it’s range.–Superior competitor was excluding the other species from preferred habitat of moist soil and food.Competition•When two species compete, one always will always be better than the other in gathering or utilizing the resource that is rare.•In the long run, the other species either loses out and disappears or evolves some adaptation.–Avoid the superior competitor by selecting a different part of habitat.–Avoid the superior competitor by making a change in diet.Example - Shift in DietThese species of the European crossbill have avoided competition by developing beaks that allow the use of different food


View Full Document

NICHOLLS BIOL 404 - Factors Limiting Distribution - Chapter 6

Download Factors Limiting Distribution - Chapter 6
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Factors Limiting Distribution - Chapter 6 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Factors Limiting Distribution - Chapter 6 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?