DOC PREVIEW
GT MATH 2401 - Partial to partials
School name Georgia Tech
Pages 35

This preview shows page 1-2-16-17-18-34-35 out of 35 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 35 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 8 MATH 2401 - Harrell Copyright 2008 by Evans M. Harrell II. Partial to partialsRecollections of last week  Cool shapes, like Möbius stripsRecollections of last week  Cool shapes, like Möbius stripsRecollections of last week  I can really get in to some of these shapes!Recollections of last week  The view from inside the hyperboloid.What is the derivative, really?  In KG calculus, it was the slope of the tangent line at a point.  For a vector function (same as curve), it still gave the direction of the tangent line at a point.  It tells us how to straighten out something that is curved, with the least error. !Ideal gas law. PV = nRT, so V(P,T) = nRT/P . If we fix P and change T to T+ ∆T, V(P,T+ ∆T) ≅ V(P,T) + (nR/P) ∆T ≅ V(P,T) (1 + ∆T/T) Extrapolating with the ideal gas lawIdeal gas law. PV = nRT, so V(P,T) = nRT/P . If we fix T and change P to P+ ∆P, V(P + ∆P,T) ≅ V(P,T) - (nRT/P2) ∆P ≅ V(P,T) (1 - ∆P/P) . Extrapolating with the ideal gas lawIdeal gas law. PV = nRT, so V(P,T) = nRT/P . What if both T and P change? Estimate the volume. We might guess V(P + ∆P,T + ∆T) ≅ V(P,T) (1 + ∆T/T - ∆P/P). Is this right? Extrapolating with the ideal gas lawThe partial derivative Just pretend y is a constant and differentiate with respect to x. Call this ∂F/∂x. If you pretend x is a constant and differentiate with respect to y, that’s ∂F/∂y.Anatomy of the partial derivative “Dee F by dee x” “F sub x”Why do we calculate partials? 1 Sometimes only interested in one variable. Example: If we only care how the concentration c(x,y) varies when we move in the x-direction, we want 󲰦c/󲰦x.This function still depends on y as well as x.Why do we calculate partials? 1 Sometimes only interested in one variable. 2 Nature loves partial derivatives: a Heat equation b Wave equation c Potential equationWhy do we calculate partials? 1 Sometimes only interested in one variable. 2 Nature loves partial derivatives: 3 All the Calculus I stuff (max-min, slopes, tangent planes rather than lines) will use partial derivatives when there is more than one variable.The partial derivative Important! ∂F/∂x and ∂F/∂y are still functions of 2 variables. Let’s do an example or two.Examples of partial derivatives (Let’s play Stump the """ !)!Examples of partial derivativesSets (something mathematicians are obsessed with) • Neighborhood of a point • Interior, boundary • Open • Closed • Neither open nor closedA set of wildebeest interior boundary isolated point exterior Copyright 2008 by Evans M. Harrell II.Limits for scalar fields Compare and contrast. limr→r0f(r) = Llimt→t0F(t) = Llimr→0x2− y2x2+ y2L(C) =!Cds =!ba"#dxdt$2+#dydt$2+#dzdt$2dtSince [H, G]uk= (H − λk)Guk,"[H, G]uk"2=%Guk, (H − λk)2Guk&'dds, t(ϕ = κnϕIn particular,#uk, [G, [H, G]] uk$ = 2 #Guk, (H − λk)Guk$R(ζ) =)Ω(|∇ζ|2+ V (x)|ζ|2)dV)Ω|ζ|2dVλn∼ 4π#Γ(1 + d/2)n|Ω|$2/d+Vave2(z−λj) #uj, [G, [H, G]] uj$−2" [H, G] uj"2=*k(z − λk)(λk− λj)| #uj, Guk$ |2q(x) = +14+*jκj,2Write the test function as1 Curves  scalar (time) in, vector (position) out  Scalar fields  vector (position) in, scalar outLimits for scalar fields What does it mean? limr→r0f(r) = Llimt→t0F(t) = Llimr→0x2− y2x2+ y2L(C) =!Cds =!ba"#dxdt$2+#dydt$2+#dzdt$2dtSince [H, G]uk= (H − λk)Guk,"[H, G]uk"2=%Guk, (H − λk)2Guk&'dds, t(ϕ = κnϕIn particular,#uk, [G, [H, G]] uk$ = 2 #Guk, (H − λk)Guk$R(ζ) =)Ω(|∇ζ|2+ V (x)|ζ|2)dV)Ω|ζ|2dVλn∼ 4π#Γ(1 + d/2)n|Ω|$2/d+Vave2(z−λj) #uj, [G, [H, G]] uj$−2" [H, G] uj"2=*k(z − λk)(λk− λj)| #uj, Guk$ |2q(x) = +14+*jκj,2Write the test function as1This kind of limit can depend on how you get where you are going.Example: What is limr→r0f(r) = Llimt→t0F(t) = Llimr→0x2− y2x2+ y2?L(C) =!Cds =!ba"#dxdt$2+#dydt$2+#dzdt$2dtSince [H, G]uk= (H − λk)Guk,"[H, G]uk"2=%Guk, (H − λk)2Guk&'dds, t(ϕ = κnϕIn particular,#uk, [G, [H, G]] uk$ = 2 #Guk, (H − λk)Guk$R(ζ) =)Ω(|∇ζ|2+ V (x)|ζ|2)dV)Ω|ζ|2dVλn∼ 4π#Γ(1 + d/2)n|Ω|$2/d+Vave2(z−λj) #uj, [G, [H, G]] uj$−2" [H, G] uj"2=*k(z − λk)(λk− λj)| #uj, Guk$ |2q(x) = +14+*jκj,2Write the test function as1Try this. First set y = 0 and let x → 0. You get the limit 1. But if you first set x = 0 and let y → 0. You get the limit -1. Weird. We don’t consider this function continuous.Second partial derivatives 1 Since fx(x,y) and fy(x,y) still depend on both variables, it makes sense to calculate fxx(x,y), fyy(x,y), fxy(x,y), fyx(x,y)Anatomy of the second partial derivative Isn’t there something funny about the x-y order? We write Fxy(x, y) or∂2F∂y∂xf(x + h) − f(x) = y · h + o(h)limr→0x2− y2x2+ y2?L(C) =!Cds =!ba"#dxdt$2+#dydt$2+#dzdt$2dtSince [H, G]uk= (H − λk)Guk,"[H, G]uk"2=%Guk, (H − λk)2Guk&'dds, t(ϕ = κnϕIn particular,#uk, [G, [H, G]] uk$ = 2 #Guk, (H − λk)Guk$R(ζ) =)Ω(|∇ζ|2+ V (x)|ζ|2)dV)Ω|ζ|2dVλn∼ 4π#Γ(1 + d/2)n|Ω|$2/d+Vave2(z−λj) #uj, [G, [H, G]] uj$−2"[H, G] uj"2=*k(z − λk)(λk− λj)| #uj, Guk$|2q(x) = +14+*jκj,2Write the test function asζ =1√ρ·


View Full Document

GT MATH 2401 - Partial to partials

Download Partial to partials
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Partial to partials and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Partial to partials 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?