DOC PREVIEW
Cal Poly Pomona PHL 485 - NORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Back to PH485 Table of ContentNORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS Normative Ethics ( Substantive Ethics or Morals )General Meaning Systematically to establish the general principles for determining right and wrong, good and evil.The body of ethical statements, or the actual moral arguments or statements of the moral philosophy.Abstract StatementsEthical MonismEthical PluralismMetaethics ( Analytical Ethics, Critical Ethics, Theoretical Ethics, Epistemology of Ethics, Ethical Logic, Ethics )General Meaning:Discussions of the meanings or uses of moral terms and utterances about the nature of moral concepts:(1) About the uses or meanings of normative statements, utterances, or terms;(2) About the logical status of moral claims;(3) About the nature of moral arguments;(4) About what constitutes a morality.Metaethics is a part of a larger movement in analytic philosophyThree Philosophical Trends (the critical, the constructive, and the mixture of two)Socrates: "Pursuit of meaning"Hume: "Anti-metaphysics"Analytic Philosophy (the analysis and clarification of concepts)Linguistic Philosophy (universal objects as the existence of universal terms in our language)Relationship between normative ethics and metaethicsNormative ethics: Having human conduct as its subject matter as " the systematic inquiry into man's conduct"?Metaethics: Having the discipline of normative ethics as its subject matter, " the systematic inquiryinto normative ethics.The third or high level--Metaphysics (twice removed)The second or middle level--Normative ethics (removed)The first or low level--Actual moral practice?Normative ethics: first order concern: talking what is good and bad, right and wrong (about truth of moral statements)Metaethics: second order concern: Talking that talk (moral language, the meaning of word "good", and the meaning of those statements)The purposes of metaethicsThe reasons of doing metaethicsMoore and the meaning of "good"1) Naturalistic fallacyWhat is naturalistic definition?It cannot for good: a. "Good" cannot be synonymous with any naturalistic property;b. "Good" does not describe a naturalistic property; "Good" describes a "non-naturalistic" property.c. Definition as senseless but goodd. Definition as sensible but no good(2) Indefinability of goodAbsolutely simple and unanalyzable components of meaning, which cannot be broken down any further." What is good in general "" Good is indefinable "" Good denotes a simple and unanalyzable property "EmotivismAyer(1) Meaningless statements(2) Meaningful statements(3) Emotional statements(4) Value statementsSteveson(1) Sharing the speaker's positive emotion(2) Moral judgments as matter of


View Full Document

Cal Poly Pomona PHL 485 - NORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS

Download NORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view NORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view NORMATIVE ETHICS AND NON-NORMATIVE ETHICS 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?