DOC PREVIEW
MIT 14 02 - Problem Set #7 Solutions

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PROBLEM SET SEVEN SOLUTIONSPROBLEM 1a. Solow Growth model where the savings rate increases.Conclusion: increase in steady-state output and capital (per effective worker), but has no effect onthe long-run growth rate of the economy. This is really right out of the book. Graphics shownbelow.b. New production function.Y = AK0.5 = Ka+0.5dK/dt = sY-dKSteady state is where dK/dt = 0 or where K* = (d/s)1/(a-0.5) and Y* = (K*)a+0.5 = (d/s)(a+0.5)/(a-0.5)Check the convexity/concavity of the savings function (sY) with respect to K.d(sY)/dK = s(a+0.5)Ka-0,5d2(sY)/dK2 = s(a+0.5)(a-0.5)Ka-1.5 > 0 iff a > 0.5 (here function is convex)d2(sY)/dK2 = s(a+0.5)(a-0.5)Ka-1.5 < 0 iff a < 0.5 (here function is concave)When a > 0.5 the savings function is convex and the steady-state is locally unstable. If the initialendowment of capital is above the steady-state, the economy will grow forever. Looking at thecapital accumulation equation, capital accumulates whenever saving (sY) is larger thandepreciation (dK), or whenever the saving curve lies above the depreciation curve. This isillustrated below.Y/ANs’YsYK/ANOn the other hand, if initial capital is below the steady-state, the economy will shrink to nothing.Dynamics are illustrated by the arrows.c. ConvergenceThe idea of convergence is motivated by a concave savings function. The dynamics of the steady-state are stable, so countries with similar savings rates, technology growth rates, and depreciationand rates will converge to the same level of per capita income over time.When the production function is convex, no country with an initial endowment above the steady-state will ever converge to any level of output per worker, and grow forever. In this sense therewill not be convergence in the levels of per capital income over time.d. Capital and TechnologyNew computers (physical capital) may make manufacturing processes more efficient, butconsultants could do the same thing by better managing the flow of materials to reduce inventoryand down time. The consultants here are really human capital.Problem 2.a. Social Security is currently financed as a “pay-as-you-go system”. In other words, the governmenttakes tax revenues from current workers and uses them to pay benefits for currently retiredworkers. Most private pension plans take contributions from employees (and employers) andinvest those funds in stocks and bonds until the employee retires. Social Security is not fullyfunded in the sense that current retirees are receiving benefits out of the contributions of youngerpeople. The quick aging of the population implies that the ratio of retirees/young worker isincreasing over time, meaning either taxes will have to increase or benefits will have to be cut inorder for the program to continue its existence. Doing nothing means the program will bebankrupt in the near future.b. Raising benefits implies lifetime wealth has increased for everyone. PIH says consumptiondepends on lifetime wealth, so people increase consumption (reducing their current saving rate).Essentially, the government is now saving for them, implying there is less need to save forretirement. The IS curve shifts to the right, and in the short-run output and interest rates increase.As this is a demand shock, we know as long as output is above its natural level, inflation willaccelerate. The budget deficit will increase, though by less in the short-run as tax revenuesincrease with output, and the savings rate of young people has decreased.c. Higher taxes offset the increase in lifetime wealth. If there is no change in overall wealth, there isno change in consumption, and savings falls one for one with the increase in taxes, simplysubstituting taxes for private saving. Note for young people, the tax effect will be stronger thanthe benefit effect if the older generation is larger (as is the case here), and lifetime resourcesY/ANs*Yd*KK/ANactually decrease. The opposite is true for the older generation. It is plausible that the IS curvedoes not shift at all (if the taxes are simply a transfer from young to old), so there are no dynamicson output, inflation, or interest rates. Savings rates are still lower, however, as private saving hasbeen displaced by


View Full Document

MIT 14 02 - Problem Set #7 Solutions

Documents in this Course
Quiz 2

Quiz 2

12 pages

Quiz 3

Quiz 3

15 pages

Quiz #2

Quiz #2

12 pages

Quiz #1

Quiz #1

10 pages

Quiz #1

Quiz #1

12 pages

Quiz 3

Quiz 3

11 pages

Recitation

Recitation

146 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

9 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

3 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

13 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

12 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

14 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

15 pages

Recitation

Recitation

123 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

11 pages

Load more
Download Problem Set #7 Solutions
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Problem Set #7 Solutions and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Problem Set #7 Solutions 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?