DOC PREVIEW
UI ECON 1100 - Monopoly, Sherman Act & Oligopoply
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

ECON 1100 1nd Edition Lecture 28 Outline of Last Lecture I. Shutdown?II. How does a monopoly workOutline of Current Lecture I.General factsII.Legal aspect of monopolyCurrent LectureI. General factsMonopoly screws up Pareto efficiencyProduce less, charge higher priceMonopoly leaves win-win trades (don’t happen)Don’t answer what/how/for whomII. Legal aspect of monopolyDirect regulation of prices (died out)Gov’t sets priceEx: railroads, trucking, airfare (used to be)Today: electricity & maybe natural gasAnti-trust lawsSherman Act (1890)Came from Midwest farmers -> railroads ‘screwing’ farmers & wanting to transport goods @ reasonable rateMonopolizing = felony (criminal law); gov’t brings suits; go to federal courtThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.“Corporations are people too” – Mitt RomneyActually true, as stated in lawCivil suit: sue for compensationSection 2: dominant firms (1 firm)Section 1: agreements (2+ firms)To monopolize – no true definitionSupreme Court decides in court whether broke law or notCongress only steps in if the definition is said to be ‘not how they meant it’Rule of Reason: way to decide if violated lawApplies to Sect. 2 cases & some Sect. 1US gov’t’s burden of proof2 part test to find someone guiltyAccused company has to have dominant position (measured by market share)~65-75% but still can go either wayANDAccused company must have taken some unreasonable/anti-competitive action to acquire or protect the dominant position Usually against company not customerLook @ various types of evidenceMicrosoft very good example of court


View Full Document

UI ECON 1100 - Monopoly, Sherman Act & Oligopoply

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Monopoly, Sherman Act & Oligopoply
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Monopoly, Sherman Act & Oligopoply and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Monopoly, Sherman Act & Oligopoply 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?