DOC PREVIEW
UW CSE 303 - Societal Implications

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 11 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

'&$%CSE 303:Concepts and Tools for Software DevelopmentHal PerkinsWinter 2009Lecture S3— Societal Implications: Software Quality, Licensing,Defect Disclosure, . . .CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 1'&$%The Big QuestionsIs software any good? Could society make it better?Who should be allowed to w rite software? Is “real” software different?What responsiblity do software w riters, users, and selle rs have?Should you be able to restrict software’s use? How?When a critical defect is discovered, who bears responsibility forrevealing or fixing it?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 2'&$%Quality Issues“Kinds” of software??• Mission-critical: nuclear-missile, hospital equipment, air-trafficcontrol, . . .• Business-critical: Online retailer, stock market, your database, . . .• Computer-critical: operating system, browser, . . .• Get what you pay for: freeware, CSE homework, . . .How do we know what is what?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 3'&$%Bug Issues• How often is it triggered?• Can an adversary make it trigger?• What damage does it do?• What is a complex piece of software supposed to do?Contrast with cars, buildings, etc.?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 4'&$%Software Re lease CycleStandard industry practice for large projects• Prioritize bugs (P1 (blockers), P2, P3, . . . )• Freeze features and non-essential changes as release approaches• Release when code is “ok” (no more P1 bugs, or no m ore thann P1 or P2 bugs, or . . . ); release might or might not be tied tothe calendarUsed by many open-source projec ts as well as com me rcial andin-house.When is a software release “done”? Is it even meaningful to talk aboutwhether software is “finished” or “ready”?• Many “agile” projects use frequent, increme ntal releases . Better?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 5'&$%Who is to blame?• A writes some C code that has an array-bounds error in it thatcan be triggered if a function is called with certain arguments.• B uses A’s code to develop an application such as a web browser.• C uses the web browser B develops.• D sets up a website that C visits. The contents of the websitetrigger the array-bounds error.• As a result of the error, C’s computer connects to E’s computerand deletes all the files there.• F knew about the error but didn’t tell anybody, in fact hadnothing to do with writing the code.CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 6'&$%ProgrammersWould software be better if “public” code required licensedprogrammers?Is a “software e ngineer” a real engineer?Who would do the lice nsing?What would you test?Who would you blame?Would you still allow “as is ” code?Would anyone use software that cost more?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 7'&$%Software Li cens esWhat can a software provider require a user to do/not-do/allow?Can a software provider declaim liability in a shrink-wrap lice nse? Doesthe user have any recourse if something does go wrong?What about software-library writers?Is open-source software more sec ure? Less secure? A lost-in-the-noisefeature?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 8'&$%Business ConcernsIf you’re a business, how high-quality do you want your software?Worth delaying the product?Worth slowing down the product?Worth having fewer features?Worth charging more?How do you feel as a customer? Can you determine quality?CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 9'&$%When Something Goes WrongIf a security-flaw is discovered:• Should we have laws forbidding publicity?• Should we have laws mandating publicity?• Should we require patching? Penalties for violation? What aboutold/ancient software (Windows 95/98, MS-DOS, Classic Mac OS,Netscape browsers)?• Is actively finding flaws good/bad/depends-what-you-do-with-it?• Viruses that fix viruses?Relevant issues: obscurity vs. se curity, malice vs. negligence, . . .CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3 10'&$%The PlanChoose 1 of 5 groups (bug pragmatics, people-licensing,software-lice nsing, business-cust omer perspective, re vealing/fixingsecurity bugs).Choose 1 or 2 theses.Choose 2-4 arguments for each side.Report on the group’s conclusion from weighing the arguments.Participate!CSE 303 Winter 2009, Lecture S3


View Full Document

UW CSE 303 - Societal Implications

Documents in this Course
Profiling

Profiling

11 pages

Profiling

Profiling

22 pages

Profiling

Profiling

11 pages

Testing

Testing

12 pages

Load more
Download Societal Implications
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Societal Implications and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Societal Implications 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?