DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley COMPSCI 164 - Logic Programming

This preview shows page 1-2-23-24 out of 24 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1 Lecture 6 Logic Programming introduction to Prolog, facts, rules Ras Bodik Shaon Barman Thibaud Hottelier Hack Your Language! CS164: Introduction to Programming Languages and Compilers, Spring 2012 UC BerkeleyToday Introduction to Prolog Assigned reading: a Prolog tutorial (link at the end) Today is no-laptop Thursday but you can use laptops to download SWI Prolog and solve excercises during lecture. 2Software Software: download SWI Prolog Usage: ?- [likes]. # loads file likes.pl Content of file likes.pl: likes(john,mary). likes(mary,jim). After loading, we can ask query: ?- likes(X,mary). #who likes mary? X = john ; # type semicolon to ask “who else?” false. # no one else 3Facts and queries Facts: likes(john,mary). likes(mary,jim). Boolean queries ?- likes(john,jim). false Existential queries ?- likes(X,jim). mary 4Terminology Ground terms (do not contain variables) father(a,b). # fact (a is father of b) ?- father(a,b). # query (is a father of b?) Non-ground terms (contain variables) likes(X,X). # fact: everyone likes himself ?- likes(X,mary). # query: who likes mary? Variables in facts are universally quantified for all X, it is true that X likes X Variables in queries are existentially quantified does there exist an X such that X likes mary? 5Generalization (a deduction rule) Facts father(abraham,isaac). Query ?- father(abraham,X). # this query is a generalization above fact We answer by finding a substitution {X=isaac}. 6Instantiation (another deduction rule) Rather than writing plus(0,1,1). plus(0,2,2). … We write plus(0,X,X). # 0+x=x plus(X,0,X). # x+0=x Query ?- plus(0,3,3). # this query is instantiation of plus(0,X,X). yes We answer by finding a substitution {X=3}. 7Rules Rules define new relationships in terms of existing ones parent(X,Y) :- father(X,Y). parent(X,Y) :- mother(X,Y). grandfather(X,Y) :- parent(X,Z), parent(Z,Y). Load family.pl [family] ?- grandfather(X,Y). X = john, Y = jim ; false. 8Database programming A database programming rule brother(Brother, Sib) :- parent(P, Brother), parent(P, Sib), male(Brother), Brother \= Sib. # same as \=(Brother,Sib) In cs164, we will translate SQL-like queries to Prolog. But Prolog can also express richer (recursive) queries: descendant(Y,X) :- father(X,Y). descendant(Y,X) :- father(X,Z), descendant(Y,Z). 9Compound terms Compound term = functors and arguments. Name of functor is an atom (lower case), not a Var. example: cons(a, cons(b, nil)) A rule: car(Head, List) :- List = cons(Head,Tail). car(Head, cons(Head,Tail)). # equivalent to the above Query: ?- car(Head, cons(a, cons(b, nil)). 10Must answer to queries be fully grounded? 11 Program: eat(thibaud, vegetables). eat(thibaud, Everything). eat(lion, thibaud). Queries: eat(thibaud, X)?A simple interpreter A representation of an abstract syntax tree int(3) plus(int(3),int(2)) plus(int(3),minus(int(2),int(3))) An interpreter eval(int(X),X). eval(plus(L,R),Res) :- eval(L,Lv), eval(R, Rv), Res is Lv + Rv. eval(minus(L,R),Res) :- # same as plus 12Lists Lists are just compounds with special, clearer syntax. Cons is denoted with a dot ‘.’ .(a,[]) is same as [a|[]] is same as [a] .(a,.(b,[])) [a|[b|[[]]] [a,b] .(a,X) [a|X] [a|X] 13Am a list? predicate Let’s test is a value is a list list([]). list([X|Xs]) :- list(Xs). Note the common Xs notation for a list of X’s. 14Let’s define the predicate member Desired usage: ?- member(b, [a,b,c]). true 15Lists car([X|Y],X). cdr([X|Y,Y). cons(X,R,[X|R]). meaning ... The head (car) of [X|Y] is X. The tail (cdr) of [X|Y] is Y. Putting X at the head and Y as the tail constructs (cons) the list [X|R]. From: http://www.csupomona.edu/~jrfisher/www/prolog_tutorial 16An operation on lists: The predicate member/2: member(X,[X|R]). member(X,[Y|R]) :- member(X,R). One can read the clauses the following way: X is a member of a list whose first element is X. X is a member of a list whose tail is R if X is a member of R. 17List Append append([],List,List). append([H|Tail],X,[H|NewTail]) :- append(Tail,X,NewTail). ?- append([a,b],[c,d],X). X = [a, b, c, d]. ?- append([a,b],X,[a,b,c,d]). X = [c, d]. Hey, “bidirectional” programming! Variables can act as both inputs and outputs 18More on append ?- append(Y,X,[a,b,c,d]). Y = [], X = [a, b, c, d] ; Y = [a], X = [b, c, d] ; Y = [a, b], X = [c, d] ; Y = [a, b, c], X = [d] ; Y = [a, b, c, d], X = [] ; false. 19Exercise for you Create an append query with infinitely many answers. ?- append(Y,X,Z). Y = [], X = Z ; Y = [_G613], Z = [_G613|X] ; Y = [_G613, _G619], Z = [_G613, _G619|X] ; Y = [_G613, _G619, _G625], Z = [_G613, _G619, _G625|X] ; 20Another exercise: desugar AST Want to rewrite each instance of 2*x with x+x: rewrite(times(int(2),R), plus(Rr,Rr)) :- !, rewrite(R,Rr). rewrite(times(L,int(2)), plus(Lr,Lr)) :- !, rewrite(L,Lr). rewrite(times(L,R),times(Lr,Rr)) :- !, rewrite(L,Lr),rewrite(R,Rr). rewrite(int(X),int(X)). 21And another exercise Analyze a program: 1) Translate a program into facts. 2) Then ask a query which answers whether a program variable is a constant at the of the program. Assume the program contains two statement kinds S ::= S* | def ID = n | if (E) ID = n You can translate the program by hand 22Some other cool examples to find in tutorials compute the derivative of a function this is example of symbolic manipulation solve a math problem by searching for a solution: “Insert +/- signs between 1 2 3 4 5 so that the result is 5.” 23Reading Required download SWI prolog go through a good prolog tutorial, including lists, recursion Recommended The Art of Prolog (this is required reading in next lecture)


View Full Document

Berkeley COMPSCI 164 - Logic Programming

Documents in this Course
Lecture 8

Lecture 8

40 pages

Load more
Download Logic Programming
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Logic Programming and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Logic Programming 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?