Unformatted text preview:

� � � � 5.73 Problem Set 5 1. Consider a system that evolves under the Hamiltonian Hˆ =ωJˆ . z Compute the average values Jˆ x ( )t , Jˆ y ( )t and Jˆ z ( )t given fixed initial values for each average. What is the vector J = Jˆ x (t) i + Jˆ y (t) j + Jˆ z (t) k doing? What aspects of the evolution are quantum mechanical and what aspects are classical? 2. Consider a particle with the wavefunction: 3 r,θ ,φ ψ = N R(r)(1− cos θ)sin θ cos φ where N is a normalization constant. a. If one performs a measurement of Lˆ2and Lˆ z for this state, what are the possible outcomes? b. The dipole moment operator is µˆ = erˆ . Does this state possess a dipole moment along the x, y or z directions? You need not compute the values of the x, y or z components; merely determine if they are zero. c. What about the quadrupole moment Mˆ = e(3zˆ2 − rˆ2 )? Is it non-zero? 3. The idea behind Lewis Dot Structures is that bonds are formed when two S=1/2 electrons from different atoms “pair” to form a state with Stot=0. First, notice that for an isolated pair of electrons, this is C1 C4 C2 J’C3 J accomplished by an “exchange” Hamiltonian Hˆ = JSˆ ⋅Sˆ i j J’ where Sˆ and Sˆ are the ij spin operators of the two electrons and J is a constant J that determines the strengthof the “bond”. In this problem, we will consider a Lewis-dot model of the bonding in cyclobutadiene. We are only interested in the 4 π-electrons, so we can write Hˆ = JSˆ ⋅Sˆ + J 'Sˆ ⋅Sˆ + JSˆ ⋅Sˆ + J 'Sˆ ⋅Sˆ 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 where, as the picture implies, J '≥ J . a) Compute the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this Hamiltonian for J = 1, J ' = 2 . b) Compute the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this Hamiltonian for J = J ' = 3/2 . c) Develop a measure for the “strength” of the bond and show that in a) the C1-C2 and C3-C4 bonds are weaker than the other two while in b) the bonds are all equivalent. 4. Consider the low energy reaction of atomic hydrogen with singlet oxygen to yield hydroxyl radical and atomic oxygen: * H·+O2 → [HO2 ·]→ ·OH+O: At low energy, the transition state complex [HO2 ·] has no rotational angular momentum. Given that the H atom is spin-* 1/2, O2 is spin-0, OH is spin-1/2, O is spin-1 and total angular momentum is conserved, what are the relative yields of O atoms with mS=+1,0,-1? That is, will one of the mS values be preferred over the others? Would it be possible for the products to be OH(mS=+1/2)+O(mS=+1)? Why or why not? 5. Consider an anharmonic potential of the form V (qˆ)= 122 3 4kqˆ −αqˆ +βqˆ use perturbation theory to compute the eigenvalues of this potential to lowest non-vanishing order in α and β . [Hint: the cubic and quartic terms will contribute at different orders] Express your result in the standard vibrational form: 1 1 1E(n)= E0 +ω e (n + 2 )−ω exe (n + 2 )2 +ω eye (n + 2 )3 Compare this result to the variational prediction you made in a previous problem set (which assumed the particular values α= .045 , β= .00107 ). Is perturbation theory accurate for this


View Full Document

MIT 5 73 - Problem Set #5

Download Problem Set #5
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Problem Set #5 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Problem Set #5 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?