# Berkeley ELENG 229B - Peak-to-Average Power Control in OFDM Systems (12 pages)

Previewing pages*1, 2, 3, 4*of 12 page document

**View the full content.**## Peak-to-Average Power Control in OFDM Systems

Previewing pages
*1, 2, 3, 4*
of
actual document.

**View the full content.**View Full Document

## Peak-to-Average Power Control in OFDM Systems

0 0 28 views

- Pages:
- 12
- School:
- University of California, Berkeley
- Course:
- Eleng 229b - Error Control Coding

**Unformatted text preview:**

Renaldi Winoto EE229B Project Peak to Average Power Control in OFDM Systems I Introduction High Peak to Average Power Ratio PAPR has been recognized as one of the major practical problem involving OFDM modulation High PAPR results from the nature of the modulation itself where multiple subcarriers sinusoids are added together to form the signal to be transmitted When N sinusoids add the peak magnitude would have a value of N where the rms average might be quite low due to destructive interference between the sinusoids High PAPR signals are usually undesirable for it usually strains the analog circuitry High PAPR signals would require a large range of dynamic linearity from the analog circuits which usually results in expensive devices and higher power consumption lower efficiency for example power amplifier has to operate with larger backoff to maintain linearity It s quite straightforward to observe that in an OFDM systems some input sequences would result in higher PAPR than others For example an input sequence that requires all subcarriers to transmit their maximum amplitudes would certainly result in a high output PAPR Thus by limiting the possible input sequences to a smallest subset it should be possible to obtain output signals with a guaranteed low output PAPR At the same time by limiting input sequences to a smaller subset we also provide the system with more resiliency in the presence of noise this idea is central in the area of error control codes Thus the question is can we set up a framework such that we can jointly optimize the selection of codewords based on both their PAPR and minimum distance performance In this project we will conduct a literature survey of the various techniques proposed to establish PAPR control in OFDM modulation The emphasis will certainly be on those techniques which uses codes designed to have both low PAPR along with good errorcorrection capabilities We will also briefly mention other methods that have been proposed in the literature These methods also indirectly take advantage of the redundancy afforded by error control coding performed on the input data sequences in that the PAPR reduction system is allowed to alter the transmitted signal a little bit introduce bit error with the hope of optimizing for PAPR In most of the main results presented here the goal is to convey the main fundamental ideas and intuitive understanding of the concept introduced using simple examples rather than dwell into the details of the more involved results This is done primarily to minimize the amount of terminology and notation that have to be introduced in this short report but also to give a complete overview of the techniques known today for PAPR reduction II OFDM Modulation and Notation It is useful to briefly review the OFDM modulation as a way to set up notation for the succeeding sections For an n subcarrier OFDM signal with carrier frequencies fo j fs with 0 j n we 2 i f o jf s t have n carrier sinusoids of the form e Suppose at a particular symbol period a length n information vector m m0 m1 mn 1 is to be transmitted Then the resulting OFDM modulated signal can be written as n 1 S m t m j e 2 i fo jf s t j 0 Each of the message symbol mj can be a general complex number However in all the papers reviewed here a PSK modulation is assumed This is done to ease the mathematical formulation of the problem and also the derivation of the results as in PSK modulation all the subcarriers would have average envelope power of n The instantaneous power of the signal S m t can be written as P m t S m t 2 Whereas the envelope power is defined as Penv m t S m t 2 We can easily see that P m t Penv m t The Peak to Average Power Ratio PAPR can be defined as PAPR m 1 sup P m t n 0 f st 1 Whereas the Peak to Mean Envelope Power Ratio PMEPR can be defined as PMEPR m 1 sup Penv m t n 0 f st 1 In the literature the term PMEPR and PAPR is sometimes used interchangeably It is more convenient to work with PMEPR than with PAPR thus in most of the theoretical literature PMEPR is used And since PMEPR upper bounded PAPR the use of PMEPR can be well justified If error control coding is to be used the length n vector c from a code C is directly modulated one coordinate of the vector c to one subcarrier in the OFDM modulation III Practical Methods of PAPR Reduction in the literature Several approaches to reduce PAPR have been suggested in the literature The simplest and somewhat crude approach involves clipping the signal High signal peaks although possible has a relatively low probability of occurring As such clipping these few peaks would not significantly impair the performance in terms of BER of the system However clipping is a highly nonlinear operation and it has an adverse impact towards the spectral purity of this signal spectral regrowth problem For that reason this approach is usually not suitable for wireless application where spectral emission is tightly controlled The paper by Li and Cimini 1 is just one example of such approach In this paper the spectral regrowth problem is somewhat alleviated by a post filtering operation to remove the out of band harmonics caused by the clipping operation However by filtering the clipped signal there is a possibility of peaks regrowing in the time domain This fact really underlies the fundamental problem of signal clipping approach in PAPR reduction it is still a relatively zero sum game between achieving good spectral purity and low PAPR The method of tone injection reserves a tone in the OFDM modulation to be injected to the system to cancel out high peaks The difficult part in this method is how to select the optimal input sequences to be modulated on this reserved tone to maximally reduce the PAPR Tellado and Cioffi 10 proposed this method and uses LP optimization to get the optimal input sequence While both approaches mentioned above are viable options for systems it does still incur some costs Clipping would inevitably introduce error effectively reducing the resiliency of the system in the presence of noise In the tone injection method a dedicated tone has to be reserved In both these approaches ultimately PAPR reduction would reduce the capacity of the system One PAPR reduction scheme that does not constitute a constant reduction of rate is the phase shift method The idea is quite simple it is based on the observations that peaks in OFDM systems occur because of the particular phase alignment between the subcarriers Thus

View Full Document