DESIGN II, FINAL DESIGN REVIEWThe purpose of the Design II, final design review is to inform the audience of the testing of the final product with respect to problem execution, and technical specifications. Packaging, cost, and PCB reliability of the final project should be discussed as well.Team: SECON Team II Reviewer: _____________ Kyle Cullen Michael Lindsey Robert Stranghoener Becky OwenAll numerical grading is on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). Please make constructive comments in the space provided.rbr/v0.4 1 of 3DESIGN II, FINAL DESIGN REVIEWPresentation Gradings (Individual)Kyle Cullen(1 to 5 score)Michael Lindsey(1 to5 score)Robert Stranghoener(1 to 5 score)Becky Owen(1 to 5 score)1. Presentation Manner (Connection with the audience, eye contact, clearly heard, fluid, nodistracting mannerisms, engaging/dynamic for audience)2. Graphics, Presentation Material (professional slides, balanced high-level and technical material, used time wisely)Presentation Comments (Individual)CommentKyle CullenMichael LindseyRobert StranghoenerBecky Owenrbr/v0.4 2 of 3Reviewers: You are not expected to enter comments in all of the spaces that are provided; these spaces are provided for your convenience.DESIGN II, FINAL DESIGN REVIEWTeam: SECON Team IIReviewer: ________________Technical Gradings (entire Team)Numeric Score3. Problem lucidly stated with clear visualization of the solution;technical specifications listed and explained within problem context(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:4. Evidence of effective teaming in testing and packaging of the finalproduct(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:5. The presentation discusses project concerns in the following areas:Sustainability and Manufacturability(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:6. Evidence of sufficient testing of final product with respect to producttechnical specifications and solution of the stated problem(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:7. Bill of materials and cost for components/packaging/construction forfinal product presented.(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:8. Has a packaged product been created that solves the stated problemand meets the technical specifications? If not, use the comment areato specify what is lacking..(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:rbr/v0.4 3 of
View Full Document