New version page

Cal Poly Pomona PSY 204 - Chapter 8 Attention and Reaction Time

Documents in this Course
Load more
Upgrade to remove ads
Upgrade to remove ads
Unformatted text preview:

Experimental Psychology PSY 433Where’s Waldo?Two Aspects of AttentionVisible Bottleneck TaskDonders A, B & C RevisitedDonders TasksDonders A -- SimpleDonders B -- ChoiceTesting for ModularityResponse ForceRT and Integrated Force (Fig 8.3)B and C Reactions (Fig 8.4)A and C Reactions (Fig 8.5)Confounding Stimulus IntensityThe Same Experiment using Letters not LED Lights (Fig 8.6)Results using LettersSpeed Accuracy TradeoffsTheios (1973)RT and Error Rate as a Function of Stimulus ProbabilityDual Task ProcessingSpeed-Accuracy TradeoffA Central BottleneckStimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA)Slide 24Pashler’s ParadigmCapacity Sharing ExplanationExplanationsStress and Cognitive ControlResultsChange Blindness DemoExperimental PsychologyPSY 433Chapter 8Attention and Reaction TimeWhere’s Waldo?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvWh6PMi9Ek&feature=player_embedded#Says Wikipedia: Werner Herzog is often considered one of the greatest figures of the New German Cinema. His films often feature heroes with impossible dreams, people with unique talents in obscure fields, or individuals who find themselves in conflict with nature. French filmmaker François Truffaut once called Herzog "the most important film director alive”.This is actually him narrating Where’s Waldo.Two Aspects of AttentionDivided attention – what happens when we try to engage in two cognitive processes at onceSelective attention – how we switch mental resources from one cognitive task to another.Visible Bottleneck Taskhttp://opl.apa.org/contributions/Pashler/prp.htmlhttp://dualtask.org – visible bottleneck I and FAQThis task illustrates how difficult it is to pay attention to two things at the same time.Both tasks require a choice of response and the same cognitive resource cannot be devoted to both tasks at the same time.The competition goes away when one task does not involve a choice (e.g., press any button when you hear a tone).Donders A, B & C RevisitedA is simple RT – see a stimulus and press a keyB is stimulus choice RT – see one of two stimuli and decide whether to press a key or notC is stimulus and response choice RT – see one of two stimuli and decide which of two keys to pressB-C gives response selection timeC-A gives ID time.Donders TasksS1  R1 Donders AS1  R1 Donders BS2  R2S1  R1 Donders CS2Donders A -- SimpleC Reaction TimeC Minus AA Reaction TimeBaseline Identification TimeSelection TimeDonders B -- ChoiceB Reaction TimeB Minus CC Reaction TimeTesting for ModularityDonders A, B & C implies that the parts of the task are modules.How can component modules be identified?When one component module can be changed without changing the others, it is independent.If Donders was correct then the three parts should be separately modifiable.Pure insertion – addition of a module without affecting the duration of the other modules.Response ForceDonders pure insertion could not be tested so an additional variable was added – response force.Response force – the amount of pressure exerted on a response key.Force increases with stimulus intensity.For Ulrich et al. (1999), response force was the same for a Donders A and B comparison, even though RTs were different.RT and Integrated Force (Fig 8.3)This result is consistent with pure insertion.B and C Reactions (Fig 8.4)The B and C RT’s should differ but they do not.A and C Reactions (Fig 8.5)Now RT’s differ as they should but force is not consistent with pure insertion.Confounding Stimulus IntensityConfound – when one or more independent variable is simultaneously varied so we can’t tell which is responsible for an effect.In Ulrich et al.’s experiment (green LED to left or right), two things were varied:Mapping of stimulus to response (one hand vs two)Apparent brightness (focusing on a single light instead of both lights)Replaced by letters X and S not lights.The Same Experiment using Letters not LED Lights (Fig 8.6)Now RT differs as it should and Force supports pure insertion.Results using LettersWhen X vs S is used, the confound of stimulus intensity is eliminated (controlled) and the results support pure insertion.Part of the problem is that all three Donders experiments were not presented:Authors wished to avoid transfer effects that occur in within-subject experiments.To avoid this, present all three Donders conditions or do the experiment between-subject.Speed Accuracy TradeoffsRT cannot be used as the only dependent variable because subjects change accuracy to maximize speed:Speed & accuracy are sometimes inversely related.RT & Accuracy must be jointly considered.Examining more than one dependent variable may be crucial to understanding the processes involved in a task.Theios (1973)Subjects had to name a digit presented visually.Probability of the digit was varied from 0.2 to 0.8.Reaction time was unaffected by probability of the digit, but accuracy was greatly affected.Highest error rate with lowest probability.To increase accuracy (keep error rate constant), RTs would have to increase.RT and Error Rate as a Function of Stimulus ProbabilityRT stays constant but as stimulus probability increases, errors decrease.Dual Task ProcessingSpeed-Accuracy TradeoffSOA (S1-S2 Interval in ms)Psychological refractory period hereA Central BottleneckWe can only process one thing at a time within a single modality (vision, hearing).Central cognition may be the most important bottleneck – the central bottleneck.Whether two tasks can be done at once depends on whether they compete for the same resources.Schumacher dual-task experiment.Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA)Pashler presented a modified Donders B task in which S1 and S2 were not presented simultaneously. The interval between them is called stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA)The shorter the SOA, the greater the effect on RT and errors.The period where one task interferes with the other is called psychological refractory period.Dual Task ProcessingPashler’s ParadigmTask 1 – hear a tone and press a key with the left hand.Task 2 – vocally call out the name of the highest digit in a display of eight digits.When subjects are not required to respond quickly to Task 2, accuracy is not affected. It only occurs with a requirement to make a speedy response.Capacity Sharing ExplanationS1S2Response selectionResponse selectionThe resource


View Full Document
Download Chapter 8 Attention and Reaction Time
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Chapter 8 Attention and Reaction Time and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Chapter 8 Attention and Reaction Time 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?