New version page

Berkeley MATH 252 - Representation Theory

Upgrade to remove ads
Upgrade to remove ads
Unformatted text preview:

REPRESENTATION THEORYWEEK 51. Invariant formsRecall that a bilinear form on a vector space V is a mapB : V × V → ksatisfyingB (cv, dw) = cdB (v, w) , B (v1+ v2, w) = B (v1, w)+B (v2, w) , B (v, w1+ w2) = B ( v, w1)+B (v, w2) .One can also think ab out a bilinear form as a vector in V∗⊗ V∗or as a homo-morphism B : V → V∗given by the formula Bv(w) = B (v, w). A bilinear form issymme tr ic if B (v, w) = B (w, v) and skew-symmetric if B (v, w) = −B (w, v). Everybilinear form is a sum B = B++ B−of a symmetri c and a skew-symmetric form,B±(v, w) =B (v, w) ± B (w, v)2.Such decomposition corresponds to the decomposition(1.1) V∗⊗V∗= S2V∗⊕Λ2V∗.A form is non-degenerate if B : V → V∗is an isomorphism, in other words B (v, V ) =0 implies v = 0.Let ρ : G → GL (V ) be a re presentation. We say that a bilinear form B on V isG-invariant ifB (ρsv, ρsw) = B (v, w)for any v, w ∈ V , s ∈ G.The foll owing properties of an invariant form are easy to check(1) If W ⊂ V is an invariant subspace, then W⊥= {v ∈ V | B (v, W ) = 0} isinvariant. In particul ar, Ker B is invariant.(2) B : V → V∗is invariant iff B ∈ HomG(V, V∗).(3) If B is invariant, then B+and B−are invariant.Lemma 1.1. Let ρ be an irreducible representation of G, then any bilinear invariantform is non-degenerate. If¯k = k, then a bilinear form is unique up to multiplicationon a scalar.Proof. Follows from (2) and Schur’s lemma. Date: September 29, 2005.12 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5Corollary 1.2. A represe ntation ρ of G admits an invariant form iff χρ(s) = χρ(s−1)for any s ∈ G.Lemma 1.3. If¯k = k, then an invariant form on an irreducible representation ρ iseither symmetric or skew-symmetric. Letmρ=1|G|Xs∈Gχρs2.Then mρ= 1, 0 or −1. If mρ= 0, then ρ does not admi t an invariant form. Ifmρ= ±1, then mρadmits a symmetric (skew-symmetric) invariant form.Proof. Recall that ρ ⊗ρ = ρalt⊕ ρsym.(χsym, 1) =1|G|Xs∈Gχρ(s2) + χρ(s2)2,(χalt, 1) =1|G|Xs∈Gχρ(s2) − χρ(s2)2.Note that1|G|Xs∈Gχρs2= (χρ, χρ∗) .Therefore(χsym, 1) =(χρ, χρ∗) + mρ2, (χalt, 1) =(χρ, χρ∗) − mρ2If ρ does not have an invariant form, then (χsym, 1) = (χalt, 1) = 0, and χρ∗6= χρ,hence (χρ, χρ∗) = 0. Thus, mρ= 0.If ρ has a symmetric invariant form, t hen (χρ, χρ∗) = 1 and (χsym, 1) = 1. Thisimplies mρ= 1. Similarl y, if ρ admits a skew-symmetric invariant form, then mρ=−1. Let k = C. An irreducible representation is called real if mρ= 1, complex if mρ= 0and quaternionic if mρ= −1. Since χρ(s−1) = ¯χρ(s), then χρtakes only real valuesfor real and quaternionic representations. If ρ is complex then χρ(s) /∈ R at least forone s ∈ G.Example. Any irreducible representation of S4is real. A non-trivi al representa-tion of Z3is complex. The two-dimensional representation of quaternionic group isquaternionic.Exercise. Let |G| be odd. Then any non-trivial irreduc ible representation of Gover C is complex.REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5 32. Some generalities about field extensionLemma 2.1. If char k = 0 and G is finite, then a representation ρ : G → GL (V ) isirreducible iff EndG(V ) is a divisi on ring.Proof. In one direction it is Schur’s Lemma. In the opposite dire ction if V is notirreducible, then V = V1⊕ V2, then the projectors p1and p2are intertwiners suchthat p1◦ p2= 0. For any extension F of k and a representation ρ : G → GL (V ) over k we defineby ρFthe re presentation G → GL (F ⊗kV ).For any re presentation ρ : G → GL (V ) we denote by VGthe subspace of G-invariants in V , i.e.VG= {v ∈ V | ρsv = v, ∀s ∈ G}.Lemma 2.2. (F ⊗kV )G= F ⊗kVG.Proof. The embedding F ⊗kVG⊂ (F ⊗kV )Gis trivial. On the other hand, VGisthe image of the operatorp =1|G|Xs∈Gτs,in particular dim VGequals the rank of p. Since rank p does not depend on a field,we havedim F ⊗kVG= dim (F ⊗kV )G. Corollary 2.3. Let ρ : G → GL (V ) and σ : G → GL (W ) be two representationsover k. ThenHomG(F ⊗kV, F ⊗kW ) = F ⊗ HomG(V, W ) .In particular,dimkHomG(V, W ) = di mFHomG(F ⊗kV, F ⊗kW ) .Proof.HomG(V, W ) = (V∗⊗ W )G. Corollary 2.4. Even i f a field is not algebraically closeddim HomG(V, W ) = (χρ, χσ) .A representation ρ : G → GL (V ) over k is called absolutely irreducible if it remainsirreducible after any extension of k. This is equi valent to (χρ, χρ) = 1. A field issplitting for a group G if any irreducible representation is absolutely irreducible. Itis not difficult to see that some finite extension of Q is a splitting field for a finitegroup G.4 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 53. Representations over RA biline ar symmetric form B is positive definite if B (v, v) > 0 for any v 6= 0.Lemma 3.1. Every representation of a finite group over R admits positive-definiteinvariant symmetric form. Two invariant symmetric forms on an ir reducible r epre-sentation are proportional.Proof. Let B′be any p ositive definite form. DefineB (v, w) =1|G|Xs∈GB′(ρsv, ρsw) .Then B is positive definite and invariant.Let Q (v, w) b e another invariant symmetric form. Then from linear algebra weknow that they can be diagonalized i n the same basis. Then for some λ ∈ R,Ker (Q −λB) 6= 0. Si nce Ker (Q − λB) is invariant, Q = λB. Theorem 3.2. Let R ⊂ K be a division ring, finite-dimensi onal over R. Then R isisomorphic R, C or H (quaternions).Proof. If K is a field, then K∼=R or C, b ecause C =¯R and [C : R] = 2. Assumethat K is not commutative. For any x ∈ K\R, R [x] = C. There fore we have a chainR ⊂ C ⊂ K. Let f (x) = ixi−1. Obviously f is an automorphism of K and f2= id.Hence K = K+⊕K−, whereK±= {x ∈ K | f ( x) = ±x}.Moreover, K+K+⊂ K+, K−K−⊂ K+, K+K−⊂ K−, K−K+⊂ K−. If x ∈ K+,then C [x] is a finite extension of C. Therefore K+= C. For any nonzero y ∈ K−the left multiplic ation on y defines an isomorphism of K+and K−as vector spacesover R. In parti cular dimRK−= dimRK+= 2. For any y ∈ K−, x ∈ C, we havey¯x = xy, therefore y2∈ R. Moreover, y2< 0. (If y2> 0, then y2= b2for somereal b and (y − b) (y + b) = 0, which is impossible). Put j =y√−y2. Then we havek = ij = −ji, ki = (ij) i = j, K = R [i, j] is isomorphic to H. Lemma 3.3. Let ρ : G → GL (V ) be an ir r educible representation over R, then thereare three possibilities:(1) EndG(V ) = R and (χρ, χρ) = 1;(2) EndG(V )∼=C and (χρ, χρ) =


View Full Document
Download Representation Theory
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Representation Theory and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Representation Theory 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?