Unformatted text preview:

Space Systems Cost Modeling Prof. David W. Miller Col. John Keesee Mr. Cyrus JillaWhy Cost Estimation? • Critically important part of system design – Too high – lose the contract award – Too low – over-run cost plus contracts, company loss on fixed price contracts • Trends – Design to cost – Cost as an independent variableWork Breakdown Structure • Multi-level table used to organize, normalize and track costs and schedule – Ensures accounting of all aspects of costs – Each element has a start time, completion time, and all components of direct costs (labor, material, etc) • Example shows top three levels for spacecraft systems – From MIL HDBK 881 – http://www.acq.osd.mil/pm/newpolicy/wbs/mil_hdbk_881/mil_hdbk_881.htmFLEX 1.0 MANAGEMENT 1.1 Project Planning & Schedule 1.1.1 Organization and Meetings 1.1.2 Schedule Maintenance 1.1.3 Implem & Work-around Plans 1.2 Financial 1.2.1 Budget Update & Forecast 1.2.2 Subcontract Monitoring 1.3 Task Manage & Tracking 1.3.1 Monitoring & Tracking 1.3.2 WBS Maintenance 1.4 Interface 1.4.1 Program Monitor 1.4.2 JSC RMS Program 1.4.3 Tech. Tracking Committee 1.4.4 Reporting 1.5 Co-I & Subcontractor Mgmt 1.5.1 Planning & Schedule 1.5.2 Technical & Task Tracking 1.6 Quality 1.6.1 Quality Program Plan 1.6.2 Nonconformance Tracking 2.0 SYSTEM ENGINEERING 2.1 Requirements 2.1.1 Expt Req Document 2.1.2 Subsystem Req. Documents 2.2 Design & Evaluation 2.2.1 3-D 1-g & 0-g Modeling 2.2.2 Feedforward Control Design 2.2.3 Feedback Control Design 2.2.4 Human-in-the-Loop Simulation 2.2.5 Performance Evaluation 2.3 Configuration Control 2.3.1 Design Documents 2.3.2 Processing &Tracking 2.3.3 Equipment List Maintenance 2.3.4 Test Matrix 2.4 Program Reviews 2.4.1 Conceptual Design Review 2.4.2 Requirements Review 2.4.3 Non-Advocate Review 2.4.4 Preliminary Design Review 2.4.5 Critical Design Review 2.4.6 Flight Readiness Review 2.4.7 Post Mission Expt Review 3.0 HARDWARE DESIGN & FAB 3.1 Arm Fabrication 3.1.1 Prototype (1) 3.1.2 Ground Test Facilities (2) 3.1.3 Flight Arms (2) 3.1.4 Motors 3.1.5 Payloads 3.3 Human Interface 3.3.1 Joystick 3.3.2 Grid W/S/W 3.3.3 Task Targets 3.3.4 Video Interface 3.2 Support Elec & Software 3.2.1 Experiment Support Module 3.2.2 Crew Interface 3.2.3 Ground Support Equipment 3.2.4 Software 3.2.5 Up/downlink Refurbishment 4.0 INTEGRATION & TEST 4.1 Engineering Model Integ 4.1.1 Robotic Arm Subsystem Tests 4.1.2 ESM Configuration 4.1.3 System Functional Testing 4.1.4 Prelim Environmental Test 4.2 Flight Model Integration 4.2.1 Integ Planning & Doc 4.2.2 Test Planning & Doc 4.2.3 Arm Subsystem Accept. Tests 4.2.4 System Integration 4.2.5 Functional Testing/Charact 4.2.6 System Accept/Cert Testing 4.3 Carrier Integration 4.3.1 Form 1628 Submittal 4.3.2 Integ Reviews (CIR, FOR,.) 4.3.3 Safety Reviews (0, I, II, III) 4.3.4 Payload Integ Plan (PIP) 4.3.5 Interface Control Doc (ICD) 4.3.6 PIP Annexes 4.3.7 Verification Activities 4.3.8 Crew Training 4.3.9 JSC Interface/Project Monit 4.3.10 Material Lists 4.3.11 Packing & Stowage Plans 4.3.12 FM Delivery & Recovery 5.0 OPERATIONS 5.1 On-Orbit 5.1.1 Diagnostics & error identi 5.1.2 Human-in-the-Loop 5.1.3 Protocol format 5.2 Ground 5.2.1 KSC 5.2.2 JSC 5.2.3 On-orbit Predictions Document 5.3 Post-Mission Activities 5.3.1 Flight Data Analysis 5.3.2 Reporting and disseminationSoftware Cost Estimation • Flight software RDT&E costs $435 / SLOC • Ground software RDT&E $220/ SLOC Language Factor Ada 1.00 UNIX-C 1.67 PASCAL 1.25 FORTRAN 0.91 SMAD Table 20-10Technology Readiness Levels Technology Readiness Level Definition Risk Std Dev (%) 1 Basic principles observed High >25 2 Conceptual design formulated High >25 3 Conceptual design tested analytically or experimentally Moderate 20-25 4 Critical function/characteristic demonstrated Moderate 15-20 5 Component or breadboard tested in relevant environment Moderate 10-15 6 Prototype/engineering model tested in relevant environment Low <10 7 Engineering model tested in space Low <10 8 Full operational capability Low <10Higher Level Cost Factors • Wraps model non-physical factors – Program support, system engineering, management costs, product assurance, integration and test • Overhead is incurred in support of an activity but is not solely identifiable to that activity – Administration, real estate taxes, facility maintenance • Level I taxes are allocated to headquarters – Defense Contract Administration Services (DCAS) – Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) – Independent Research and Development (IR&D)Higher Level Cost Factors (continued) • Program Support – Costs activities, systems and hardware development outside the prime contract • Analyses • Govt test facilities, equipment and personnel • Program office support contractors for technical oversight • Advanced development studies •FeeManagement Reserves • Account for cost and schedule uncertainty – Regression analysis – Complexity factor uncertainty – Cost driver input uncertainty – Time and material cost – Vendor ROMs • Should be held at Management level • Should not be used to accommodate scope changes Development Status Reserve Percent Off the shelf; hardware exists; no 10% mods required Modifications required to existing 15% hardware New hardware but design passed 20% CDR; vendor quotes New hardware but design passed 25% PDR New design but within state of the 35% art; Cost est from CERs; vendor ROMs New design; remote analogs, outside SOTA 50%Production Costs • Non-recurring costs include design, drafting, engineering unit integration, assembly and test, GSE, and design verification • Recurring includes flight hardware manufacture, IA&T • Theoretical First Unit is the basis for calculating costs for the production run • Protoflight unit is the qualification test unit that is refurbished for flight • Prototype units don’t flyAnnual Funding Profiles • Total RDT&E costs must be spread across the development years – Typically loaded toward the earlier years • NASA uses a Beta curve but other models exist – http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/bu2/beta.html • Similar models are used for production runsInflation • CERs are based on constant year dollars and must be inflated to determine the total value and year-by-year requirement • Inflation factors for each type of money (RDT&E, Production, Operation) are published by


View Full Document

MIT 16 851 - Space Systems Cost Mode;ing

Download Space Systems Cost Mode;ing
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Space Systems Cost Mode;ing and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Space Systems Cost Mode;ing 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?