Communication and Problem Solving in the FamilyThe Importance of Communication for FamiliesHonesty, the best policy?Exchange of InformationMessageSenderReceiverEncoding the MessageDecoding the MessageCommunication is an Exchange of InformationArticle FacilitationDifferences in Emphasis in CommunicationSlide 13We Communicate Using Two Basic ChannelsTwo Basic ChannelsDysfunctional Communication Patterns (Satir)Functional Communication PatternDiscussionWarning Signs of Relationship Problems (Gottman) – Four Horsemen of the ApocalypseCriticismContemptDefensivenessStonewallingThe 5-to-1 Ratio for Healthy RelationshipsFinal Thoughts on Lecture MaterialMarriage and Family InteractionHPER F258Kathleen R. Gilbert, Ph.D.Positive relationship between marital satisfaction and couple’s ability to communicateNot lack of communication, per se, but the quality of communication◦Problem if destructive (put-downs, negative messages)◦“Quality not quantity”In your small groups, discuss the following:◦What are your thoughts on these two statements:“It is important to be completely honest in a relationship.”“Sometimes, it’s better to ‘skirt the truth’ than to be completely honest.”◦Is there ever a time when it’s better to be dishonest in a relationship?◦How does the relationship recover when a dishonesty is discovered?Ideas, feelings shared with another personSent through both channelsConsistent vs. mixed messages◦Are channels consistent?◦Can become a power thing (“what do you mean I’m not clear. You’re always saying that!”)Person who constructs message and attempts to send itGenerally what we think of as someone communicatingMay be intentional or unintentionalArguing with spouse is intentional; children hearing argument may be unintentionalPerson who receives the message sent by the senderListener (but more active than that)May be intentional or unintentional receiverIf unintentional, may be no way of clarifying what was meantIn order to send message, must first organize thoughts/gestures/phrasing so that they can be understood by the receiverReceiver makes sense of message by decoding it into feelings, intentions, and thoughts that mean something to him or herMay be difficult because decoder (listener) filters message through own perceptions and must cope with the filters of the sender and the environmentTwo basic forms of information◦Cognitive Information“thinking part”◦Affective Information“feeling part”In your small groups discuss article #10, “ New Technologies” What are your thoughts on the use of the internet as a tool for finding dating and mating partners? What might be communication strengths and weaknesses of the internet for this purpose?Gender differences◦Males tend to focus on cognitive elements“Report talk”Focus is on problem solving and on end resultMore likely to use communication for competition◦Females tend to focus on affective elements“Rapport talk”Focus is on the process rather than an outcome More likely to use communication as a tool for communication or for advancing the relationshipGenerational/age differences◦Power differential is at issue◦Differences in ability to communicateMay speak different first languageDevelopmental ability to communicateNormal for children—but remember that elderly may have had stroke or other communication problemsContent – what is communicatedStyle – how it is communicated◦Different colloquial language (slang)Used to create and maintain the separateness◦Secret languageCan be used to maintain a separation from othersVerbal communication (digital)◦Think of a digital clock◦Spoken words◦Can break it into communication “bits” Words, phrases◦What you would see in a transcript of a conversation◦What is communicated, not how it is communicated◦Only makes up 35% of message (at best)(Satir)Non-verbal communication (analogic)◦Think of an analogue (face) clock◦body language – the messages you communicate using your body◦Paralanguage – tone, phrasing◦We can only guess at some of this, much is implied and approximate◦It is impossible to not communicateEven silence communicates a message◦Most affective communication is done through non-verbal means◦Because it is non-verbal, it is subject to misinterpretation◦How it is communicated, not what is communicatedPlacater -- pleases, apologizes, never disagrees, no matter whatBlamer – fault-finder, dictator, boss who acts superior to othersComputer - very correct, very reasonable, shows no semblance of feelingsDistracter - does or says irrelevant things to whatever anyone else is saying or doingLeveler - straight-forward communication, no games, verbal and non-verbal communication is in congruenceDiscuss the form of communication you saw as you were growing up.◦Thinking back to your childhood family, do you recognize any of the functional or dysfunctional communication patterns?◦Are there other ways of communicating that you recognize that are not included in Satir’s categories?Four horsemen don’t indicate the end of the relationship but are warningsAttacking someone’s personality or character rather than a specific behavior, usually with blameOften starts with complaining (which can make marriages stronger) bad when it becomes overriding focus of communication or won’t let go of past transgressions (“gunnysacking”)Intention to insult and psychologically abuse partner, verbal and nonverbal messages are contemptuous.Includes negative thoughts about partner. Focal point of the relationship becomes abuse (insults and name calling, hostile humor, mockery, body language)Both feel victimized by other and neither willing to take responsibility for setting things right.Both feel innocent, denying responsibility, making excuses, disagreeing with negative mind-reading, “cross-complaining,” repeating themselvesGo from poor communication to shutting downConveys a message of disapproval, distance and smugnessVery upsetting for speaker (especially if stonewaller is a male)In order to compensate for their disproportionate effect, it is necessary to have a ratio of 5 good interaction elements to compensate for 1 negative one◦Includes verbal and nonverbal elementsE.g., positive expressions, conciliatory
View Full Document