DOC PREVIEW
PSU GEOSC 001 - The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Geoscience 001 Fall 2005 Field Trip Lab The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations Materials: Students: hand lens, field notebooks Site: Hwy 322 By-Pass, just south of Hwy 26 overpass, along the east side of the road. This is a busy road, so stay well off the shoulder at all times and keep your wits about you. The exposure itself is very steep and you should avoid climbing up onto the face — you can see plenty from the ground level. Background: The Bellefonte Formation and overlying Nealmont Formation are both Mid-Ordovician in age, which means about 471 to 461 Ma. These formations are found over a broad region up and down the Appalachian mountains. During this time period, North America and Africa (and any microcontinents or volcanic arcs between them) were still separated. We know from paleomagnetic studies that this area was close to the equator. With sedimentary rocks, there are a number of questions to answer. The main questions are related to understanding what the environment of deposition was like. Was it marine or terrestrial? Was it shallow water or deep water? How shallow, or how deep? Within the photic zone? (less than about 20 m) Above or below the storm wave base? (less than 100-200 m) What are the sediment particles composed of? Where might they have come from? Was there some eroding landmass nearby? What kinds of fossils are present (if any)? What do these fossils tell us about the environment? Are their shells well-preserved or all broken up? Are the shells delicate looking or robust? Are there trace fossils (i.e., worm burrows)? If so, what can they tell you about the degree of oxygenation or the suddenness of deposition? (no burrows could mean low oxygen on the bottom of the sea or it could mean very rapid sedimentation, maybe even just a pulse of rapid deposition such as occurs after a storm). The list of questions can go on and on, but you can see that they all contribute to developing a picture of what the depositional environment was like. If you see a sequence of sedimentary rocks that look like they are deposited in shallow water and the thickness is greater than the presumed water depth, then it means that in a relative sense, sea level was rising during the deposition. For instance, if we see stromatolites or ooids, we’ll assume the water depth was only a couple of meters, so if you see more than 2 meters of carbonate sediments on top of the stromatolites, you know that relative sea level was rising. A relative sea level rise could be due to a global (eustatic) sea level rise, or it could be due to subsidence (sinking) of the crust, or both. Remember that carbonate sediments (limestones and dolostones) are usually formed from fossil fragments that grew in or very near the site of deposition and the size of the particles is not so significant, because it may just be a function of how big the organismswere, not how strong or energetic the water was at the site of deposition. In contrast siliciclastics (sandstones and their cousins) are derived from weathering exposed rocks on the continents and then transportation of those sediments to the depositional site; the grain size of those sediments is a measure of current strength (related to wave energy and thus water depth) and distance from the shore in the case of marine siliciclastic rocks; sands are deposited closer to shore, clays are deposited much further from shore, where the water energy on the seafloor is low enough to allow the clays to settle and accumulate. In carbonate rocks, the presence of fine-grained mud gives an indication of quiet water (the mud is swept away in shallower, energetic environments, leaving behind coarser carbonate composed of larger shell fragments). Goals: The goals in this lab are to describe the different kinds of rock that make up this formation and study their arrangement stratigraphically and to look for (and describe/document) clues that relate to the depositional environment. One thing to consider here is what the vertical succession of rock types might mean — what might have caused the changes you observe. Are there cycles of rock types that repeat over time? What to turn in: Each group of three people should make one detailed stratigraphic column for a 3-4 m thick section that spans the Bellefonte Fm. and the Nealmont Fm. (TAs will show you the contact), that includes information about bed compositions, thicknesses, bedding plane contacts (sharp, gradational, flat, undulatory, etc.), sedimentary structures, fossils or fragments of fossils, color, approximate particle size (clay, silt, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand). These stratigraphic columns can be hand-drawn and you may use color if you please. They will be graded in part on neatness and in part on accuracy. As a group, write 1-2 paragraphs summarizing your observations and interpretations, focusing on the question of what the depositional environment was like — what was going on here during this period of time? Does one formation have more carbonate than the other? More clay than the other? Thicker beds than the other? More fossils than the other? Does one formation reflect deeper water conditions (quieter, farther from shore) than the other? Be sure to include the observations that form the basis for your conclusions (well, conclusions is probably too final-sounding; these should be “working hypotheses” subject to revision as more is learned).stratigraphic thickness or height (m)10234White sandstone, gray on weathered surface; well-sorted, well-rounded, medium quartz sand with cross-beds ~20 cm high, occasional fragments of fossil clams.Gray oolitic limestone with not clay (just calcite cement) betweeen ooids, light gray on weathered surface, thinly bedded (10 cm), with occasional fragments of crinoids and corals, beds are separated by stylolites, no sedimentary structures.Brown siltstone, finely laminated (1-2 cm beds), composed of quartz and micas; weathers light brown; occasional worm burrows.Dark brown/green shale, weathers gray-green; planktonic fossils, finely laminated (<1 cm).Tan sandy-silty limestone, darker brown on weathered surface, thinly bedded (5cm), with some brachipods and worm burrows, beds are separated by very thin shale layers, no sedimentary structures.descriptions of rocksMaking a Stratigraphic ColumnA stratigraphic column is a graphical means of representing a wide range of observations about the sequence of strat you


View Full Document

PSU GEOSC 001 - The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations

Download The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Bellefonte Formation and Nealmont Formations 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?