DOC PREVIEW
UA ECON 520 - Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Economics 520, Fall 2009Lecture Note 1: Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics1You should already be familiar with basic set-theoretic notation and operations, suchas unions, intersections, complementation, empty set.Definition 1 The sample space (denoted by Ω) is the set of all possible outcomes ofan experiment.Example 1: Tossing a die. There are six outcomes in the sample space, correspondingto the number on top of the die, so we can take Ω = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.Definition 2 An event (denoted by E) is a collection of possible outcomes of an exper-iment, that is, a subset of the sample space.Example 1 continued: Possible events include “an odd number”, E1= {1, 3, 5}, “aneven number”, E2= {2, 4, 6}, or “a number less than 3”, E3= {1, 2}.Definition 3 Two events E1and E2are disjoint if their intersection E1∩ E2is equal tothe empty set ∅.Example 1 continued: E1and E2are disjoint because their intersection is empty, butE1and E3are not disjoint because their intersection is {1}.Definition 4 If the sets E1, E2, . . . are pairwise disjoint and their union ∪Eis equal tothe sample space, the collection E1, E2, . . . forms a partition of the sample space.Example 1 continued: E1and E2form a partition: they are disjoint and their union isthe entire sample space Ω.Example 2: Relative humidity on a randomly selected day. In this case we might takeΩ = [0, 1], the unit interval. (In practice, the relevant quantity might only be measuredwith finite precision, but it is often a convenient fiction to suppose that the quantitycan take on a continuum of values.) The eventsE1= [0, .1), E2= [.1, .7), E3= [.7, 1]form a partition of the sample space. Of course there are many other possible ways topartition the unit interval.Loosely speaking, a probability distribution assigns probabilities between 0 and 1 todifferent possible events. In Example 1, a fair die would assign probability 1/6 to the1This note and many of the later lecture notes are based on notes written by Guido Imbens. I thank himfor permission to use his material in this course.1event {1} which corresponds to rolling a “1.” So we want to define a set of events overwhich probabilities will be assigned:Definition 5 A collection B of subsets of Ω is a sigma-algebra if it satisfies the follow- Note: CB uses“Borel field”instead of“sigma-algebra.”ing three conditions:1. The empty set ∅ is contained in B.2. If E ∈ B then its complement Ec= {ω ∈ Ω|ω /∈ E} is also in B.3. B is closed under countable unions, that is, if E1, E2, . . . are all in B, then so is ∪E.One possible sigma-algebra (in fact the smallest possible one) is B1= {∅, Ω}. Thisworks for any Ω, but this is not a very interesting sigma-algebra.For Example 1, a possible sigma-algebra is B2= {∅, Ω, {1}, {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}}. You shouldverify that this satisfies the three conditions of the definition.Another possible sigma-algebra for Example 1 is the power set, the set of all subsets Sometimeswritten as 2Ωof Ω.For a given sample space, we’d like the probability distribution to assign probabilitiesto as many different events as possible. In Example 1, it is possible to assign probabil-ities consistently to every member of the power set. For example, with a fair die theprobability of E = {1, 2} is equal to the probability of {1} plus the probability of {2},i.e. 1/6+1/6 = 1/3.However, in Example 2 when Ω = [0, 1], it turns out that there is no way to do this forevery possible subset of Ω. In this case, the power set is so large that we have to limit This is explainedin Billingsley,Probability andMeasure, p.45.our attention to a large, but technically more manageable, collection of sets.Definition 6 (Kolmogorov Axioms) Given a sample space Ω and an associated sigma-algebra B, a probability function is a function P from B to the real line satisfying:1. (Nonnegativity) For all E ∈ B, P(E) ≥ 0.2. (Unit probability for the sample space) P(Ω) = 1.3. (Additivity of probability of disjoint sets) If E1, E2, . . . are pairwise disjoint, thenP(∪E) =PP(E).Remarks:1. The empty set ∅ is contained in B and therefore its complement Ω = ∅cis alsocontained in B. Hence the second condition is well defined.2. If the Borel field is finite, Condition 3 need only hold for finite unions.2Example 1 continued: For a fair die,P(E) =nmber of otcomes in Etotl nmber of otcomes in Ω.This assigns probability 1/6 to each of the six outcomes. Alternatively we can assignany other nonnegative number to each of the six outcomes provided they add up toone.An immediate implication of the Kolmogorov axioms is thatP(Ec) = 1 − P(E),because1 = P(Ω) = P(E) + P(Ec) .Therefore:P(∅) = P(Ωc) = 1 − P(Ω) = 0.Another useful result: for any events E1and E2,P(E1∪ E2) = P(E1) + P(E2) − P(E1∩ E2) .The proof, typical for this type of result, relies on creating pairwise disjoint sets forwhich one can add up the probabities by the third axiom:P(E1∪ E2) = P( E1∩ Ec2) ∪ (Ec1∩ E2) ∪ (E1∩ E2)= P( E1∩ Ec2) + P(Ec1∩ E2) + P(E1∩ E2) . (1)Also:P(E1) = P(E1∩ E2) + P(E1∩ Ec2) ,which, after rearranging, givesP(E1∩ Ec2) = P(E1) − P(E1∩ E2) ,which after substituting in (1) gives the desired result.You should read CB 1.2.2 for further results of this type, which help in calculating prob-abilities for complicated events.Counting and ProbabilityEarly problems in the history of probability often involved games of chance where theprobabilities for basic outcomes were clear but the probabilities of interesting eventswere difficult to calculate because of the large number of basic outcomes for eventsof interest. A number of these problems can be formulated as problems of drawing3k objects with and without replacement out of a set of n while being or not beingconcerned with the ordering. Solving them requires counting the ways in which youcan do this. As an example we consider the case where we have n = 4 objects, labelledA, B, C, and D, and wish to draw k = 2. Recall that n! = n × (n − 1) × (n − 2) × · · · × 1 iscalled n factorial.Result 1 (ordered, with replacement) The total number of ways k objects can bedrawn out of a set of n with replacement is nk.For the first draw there are n choices, for the second one there are again n choices andso on. In the example, the set of outcomes is{AA, AB, AC, AD, BA, BB, BC, BD, CA, CB, CC, CD, DA, DB, DC, DD},with sixteen


View Full Document

UA ECON 520 - Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics

Download Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Elementary Probability Theory and Combinatorics 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?