DOC PREVIEW
OSU BA 471 - Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation Analysis

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 13 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation AnalysisSlide 2Survey ResultsSlide 4Positive FeedbackPositive Feedback Cont.Negative FeedbackNegative Feedback Cont.Industry RTO ResultsSlide 10Slide 11Slide 12Dr. Sullivan’s ResultsDisaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation AnalysisTheodore Smith and Sean SnodgrassDisaster PreventionAnd RecoveryData Recovery SystemsMirroringTapeElect. VaultingSitesHot SitesWarmSitesCold SitesCostlyUsefulImprove Business FunctionsDecrease ReworkMaintenanceTestingSave MoneySurvey ResultsWhat is a "hot site"? An area that your company has to setup(C1) A very warm room(C2) An offsite data facility (C3)On average, how often do companies test their disaster recovery program? Never(C1) Once a year(C2) Twice a year(C3) Quarterly(C4)Survey ResultsRate our presentation We had good eye contact(C1) We were interactive(C2) We were entertaining(C3) Our information was organized well(C4) We deserve an A(C5)Positive Feedback•humor •It was really easy to follow. •You guys seemed to know what you were talking about. You were both good public speakers. I enjoyed it a lot. •Interacted w/ class •very informative! Great example using the College of business network •Engaging, kept audience attention, easy to understand•Good presentation skills, made it easy to understand what you were saying. You guys also did a good job of communicating a somewhat complex topic in a way that was easy to understandPositive Feedback Cont.•I liked the activity at the end of the presentation. The questions throughout the presentation towards the class...something that engages the class in what you're talking about. showing us where the data at OSU is and how often it is backed up. •I like the matching outfits. •Covered material well. •you guys were very confident and well informed. Being able to be confident and relay information without being nervous was really nice =D •Well presented •It had a lot of good information about the different types of systems companies use to backup their data information.Negative Feedback•n/a •I think that you did a very good job and currently I can not think of something to help you improve.•Real world examples •I am personally interested in smaller business.... ie restaurants... and was looking for information about smaller businesses... i would assume thought that smaller businesses have much less information and are at a less risky position for data loss... •Delivery! •stay a bit longer on the definition slide •NANegative Feedback Cont.•Done something to get the group more involved, rather than just ask for input into a topic, make it exciting for them. •timing? too many statistics •better survey questions •shown a quick video clip •It could have been a little more interesting. •nothing really •louder voicesIndustry RTO Results•Class did well overall•Local vs. federal government•Regulated industriesIndustryLess than 4 hours4 to 12 hours13 to 24 hours24 to 72 hours72 hours or more Utilities 66.70% 33.30% Transportation 45.00% 25.00% 10.00% 20.00%Services 27.30% 21.80% 25.50% 21.80% 3.60%Retail/Wholesale 17.20% 6.90% 20.70% 24.10% 31.00%Local/State/Regional Government 73.30% 13.30% 6.70% 6.70% Federal Government 33.30% 8.30% 8.30% 33.30% 16.70%Healthcare Provider 37.10% 17.10% 11.40% 22.90% 11.40%Financial Services 32.30% 31.30% 14.60% 18.80% 3.10%Energy 66.70% 33.30% Education 12.20% 12.20% 18.40% 36.70% 20.40%Communications 32.10% 32.10% 10.70% 21.40% 3.60%Industry RTO ResultsUtilities Transportation Services Retail/Wholesale Local Govt Federal Government Healthcare Provider Financial Services Energy Education Manufacturing Communications Industry RTO ResultsDr. Sullivan’s Results Utilities Transportation Services Retail/Wholesale Local Govt Federal Government Healthcare Provider Financial Services Energy Education Manufacturing


View Full Document

OSU BA 471 - Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation Analysis

Documents in this Course
D B M S

D B M S

13 pages

D B M S

D B M S

13 pages

RFID

RFID

12 pages

XML

XML

8 pages

W3C- Web

W3C- Web

23 pages

Linux

Linux

21 pages

Telecoms

Telecoms

11 pages

Linux

Linux

11 pages

Load more
Download Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation Analysis
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation Analysis and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Disaster Prevention and Recovery Presentation Analysis 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?